LUDOMILA ANTONIO M PEREIRA,THIVIM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(2), PANAJI
In the result, all the four appeals of the assessees are allowed
ITA 427/PAN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji30 Aug 2022AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalita Nos.427 & 428/Pan/2018 Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11 Ludomila Antonio M Income Tax Officer, Ward- Pereira 2(2), Panaji. Hn 134/3, Deus Cadeau, Vs. Auchit Waddo, Thivim, Bardez, Goa (Pan: Abapl7447B) (Appellant) (Respondent) &
For Appellant: Shri S. J. Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri Mayur Kamble, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 5A
25,000
Total
28,00,000
5.2. In the course of assessment proceedings, assessees submitted that they are not in the business of any mining related activity and, therefore, the aforesaid capital asset was not a business asset and hence, not shown in the Balance Sheets of the assessees which otherwise were prepared for their business of Bar and Restaurant