SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, 2, BELAGAVI
Appeals are DISMISSED
ITA 259/PAN/2025[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2006-07
Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali
For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)
section 249 of the Act.
ITAT-Panaji Page 6 of 22
Neha Prasanna Ghotage Vs ACIT, Belgaum
ITA No. 259 to 268/PAN/2025 AY: 2006-07 to 2010-11
10. Alike in former cases, opportunities provided to showcase ‘sufficient cause’ behind such belated filings in these cases also went futile as no evidence and explanations were filed. In the event
