SURAJ MELVIN MASCARENHAS,MIRAMAR vs. ITO, WARD - 1(1), PANAJI
The appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations
ITA 258/PAN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji31 Mar 2022AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 258/Pan/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Mrs. Suraj Melvin Masacarenhas 33, Lake View Colony, Miramar, Panaji Goa. Pan: Agipm3248G .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Panaji, Goa ……""यथ" / Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Sourabh Nayak, Sr. Dr
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 69
section for initiating penalty proceedings was in printed from without specifying grounds of initiation of penalty proceedings i.e. whether the same was issued for concealment of income or for furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income.
5. Any other ground that may be urged at the time of hearing of appeal.”
2. Briefly stated, the assessee had filed her return
