BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Reassessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai477Delhi402Ahmedabad167Jaipur137Chennai128Kolkata108Bangalore106Pune92Raipur68Rajkot67Hyderabad59Chandigarh54Indore54Surat36Nagpur29Cochin26Allahabad26Cuttack25Patna25Amritsar23Lucknow20Agra18Ranchi18Visakhapatnam14Dehradun13Panaji10Jodhpur8Guwahati7Jabalpur5Varanasi2

Key Topics

Section 24940Section 14430Section 246A20Section 253(1)10Section 25010Section 271(1)(c)10Penalty10Limitation/Time-bar10Condonation of Delay

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, 2, BELAGAVI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 259/PAN/2025[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act the demand liability qua each assessment year vide separate notice u/s 156 of the Act was raised on 30/09/2014 and communicated to the appellant at her registered address as were available on the record with the Revenue i.e. #202, railway Parallel Road, Chidambar Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka. Which the appellant could hardly

10

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2, BELAGAVI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 260/PAN/2025[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act the demand liability qua each assessment year vide separate notice u/s 156 of the Act was raised on 30/09/2014 and communicated to the appellant at her registered address as were available on the record with the Revenue i.e. #202, railway Parallel Road, Chidambar Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka. Which the appellant could hardly

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2, BELAGAVI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 261/PAN/2025[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act the demand liability qua each assessment year vide separate notice u/s 156 of the Act was raised on 30/09/2014 and communicated to the appellant at her registered address as were available on the record with the Revenue i.e. #202, railway Parallel Road, Chidambar Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka. Which the appellant could hardly

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2, BELAGAVI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 262/PAN/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act the demand liability qua each assessment year vide separate notice u/s 156 of the Act was raised on 30/09/2014 and communicated to the appellant at her registered address as were available on the record with the Revenue i.e. #202, railway Parallel Road, Chidambar Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka. Which the appellant could hardly

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2, BELAGAVI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 263/PAN/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act the demand liability qua each assessment year vide separate notice u/s 156 of the Act was raised on 30/09/2014 and communicated to the appellant at her registered address as were available on the record with the Revenue i.e. #202, railway Parallel Road, Chidambar Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka. Which the appellant could hardly

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, KARWAR

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 264/PAN/2025[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act the demand liability qua each assessment year vide separate notice u/s 156 of the Act was raised on 30/09/2014 and communicated to the appellant at her registered address as were available on the record with the Revenue i.e. #202, railway Parallel Road, Chidambar Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka. Which the appellant could hardly

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, KARWAR

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 265/PAN/2025[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act the demand liability qua each assessment year vide separate notice u/s 156 of the Act was raised on 30/09/2014 and communicated to the appellant at her registered address as were available on the record with the Revenue i.e. #202, railway Parallel Road, Chidambar Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka. Which the appellant could hardly

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, KARWAR

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 266/PAN/2025[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act the demand liability qua each assessment year vide separate notice u/s 156 of the Act was raised on 30/09/2014 and communicated to the appellant at her registered address as were available on the record with the Revenue i.e. #202, railway Parallel Road, Chidambar Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka. Which the appellant could hardly

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, KARWAR

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 267/PAN/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act the demand liability qua each assessment year vide separate notice u/s 156 of the Act was raised on 30/09/2014 and communicated to the appellant at her registered address as were available on the record with the Revenue i.e. #202, railway Parallel Road, Chidambar Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka. Which the appellant could hardly

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, KARWAR

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 268/PAN/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act the demand liability qua each assessment year vide separate notice u/s 156 of the Act was raised on 30/09/2014 and communicated to the appellant at her registered address as were available on the record with the Revenue i.e. #202, railway Parallel Road, Chidambar Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka. Which the appellant could hardly