BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Unexplained Investmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi929Mumbai878Jaipur336Chennai335Hyderabad274Bangalore264Chandigarh161Ahmedabad146Pune142Indore140Cochin138Kolkata100Amritsar98Visakhapatnam96Rajkot69Surat66Nagpur64Raipur47Lucknow35Calcutta34Agra34Guwahati32Allahabad23Cuttack23Jodhpur18Patna18Karnataka10Telangana8Dehradun6Panaji4Jabalpur4Varanasi4SC4Gauhati1Punjab & Haryana1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Addition to Income4Section 1443Section 250(6)2Section 1322Section 133A2Section 144C(5)2Natural Justice2Disallowance2Survey u/s 133A2

SANGEETA SUNIL JOLAPURE,DAVORLIM, SALCETE, GOA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by assesse is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 293/PAN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji09 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos.293/Pan/2024 (A.Y. 2015-16) Sangeeta Sunil Jolapure, Vs National Faceless Saval Virgincar Classic, Assessment Centre, . Near Maruti Mandir,Davorlim, 2 Floor, F-Ramp, Salcete-403601, Jawaharlal Nehru Goa. Stadium, New Delhi-110003. Pan/Gir No. Admpj8290Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) Assessee By None(Letter Dated 7-4-2025) Revenue By Shri.Narendar Reddy..Sr.Dr

Section 144

investments and there was no compliance. Whereas the A.O found that the assesse has made (i) fixed deposit of Rs.50,00,000/-in the bank and received interest income of Rs.8.35.837/- and income from house property as per ITS details of Rs.2,50,000/- were not offered for tax and explanations were called to substantiate the sources of deposit

ASHOK APPAJI PATIL,BELGAUM vs. INTL. TAXATION WARD, PANAJI, PANAJI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 49/PAN/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed
ITAT Panaji
03 Jul 2025
AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A.No.49/Pan/2025 (A.Y.2016-17) Ashok Appaji Patil, Vs. I T O, 3338/1A,Sankalp International Taxation, Building, 3 Floor, Gondhalli Galli, Reac, Belagavi-590001, Panaji-403001, Karnataka. Goa. Pan/Gir No:Aqopp2917M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Letter Dt 1-07-2025. Respondent By : Smt.Rijula Uniyal.Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 02.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 03.07.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Assessing Officer Passed U/S 144 R.W.S 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Passed In Pursuance To The Directions Of The Dispute Resolution Panel (Drp) U/S 144C(5) Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised Grounds Of Appeal Challenging The Action Of Lower Authorities Drp/Ao Partly Sustaining The Addition Without Providing

For Appellant: Letter dt 1-07-2025For Respondent: Smt.Rijula Uniyal.Sr.DR
Section 144Section 144C(1)Section 144C(5)

property. The assessee has filed the explanations along with sources and housing loan with respect to purchase of two flats at Borivali Mumbai dealt at Para 5 to 7.4 of the order. Whereas the AO was not satisfied with the explanations in respect of Sources of purchases to the extent of Rs.42,00,000/- made an addition u/sec 69 & u/sec69A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1), PANAJI vs. PRATEEK ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED, PANAJI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 75/PAN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji29 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No. 75/Pan/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri. Shrinivas Nayak, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Ranjan Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 250(6)

House, Off Eastern Express Highway, opposite Sion-Chunabhatti signal, Sion (E), Mumbai- 400 002 hereinafter called “the Developer" (which expression shall unless it be repugnant to the context or meaning thereof be deemed to mean and include its successors and assigns) of the First Part; And Prateek Alloya Private Limited PAN no. AAACP 1598D at Plot no. 108, kundaim Industrial

M/S PRATEEK ALLOYS PVT. LTD.,PANAJI vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), PANAJI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 279/PAN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji29 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No. 75/Pan/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri. Shrinivas Nayak, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Ranjan Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 250(6)

House, Off Eastern Express Highway, opposite Sion-Chunabhatti signal, Sion (E), Mumbai- 400 002 hereinafter called “the Developer" (which expression shall unless it be repugnant to the context or meaning thereof be deemed to mean and include its successors and assigns) of the First Part; And Prateek Alloya Private Limited PAN no. AAACP 1598D at Plot no. 108, kundaim Industrial