BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Section 36(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,337Mumbai2,182Bangalore830Karnataka629Chennai488Jaipur350Kolkata335Hyderabad304Ahmedabad295Chandigarh199Surat137Pune136Telangana127Indore113Cochin86Raipur72Calcutta57Rajkot52Visakhapatnam51SC50Amritsar49Nagpur48Lucknow41Cuttack36Agra31Guwahati25Patna16Rajasthan14Varanasi11Kerala10Jodhpur9Orissa8Allahabad6Jabalpur5Ranchi5Dehradun4Punjab & Haryana2Panaji2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Himachal Pradesh1Andhra Pradesh1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 43(5)2Section 362Section 432Section 2632Section 402Section 194A(3)(iv)2

BEIERSDORF INDIA (P) LTD.,PANAJI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4),, PANAJI

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 337/PAN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji17 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Sh D.E. Robinson, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh Ranjan Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 28Section 36Section 43Section 43(5)

section 36(1)(vii) of the Act. Therefore, the A.O. as well as the Ld. CIT(A) was right in dismissing the claim of assessee. 5. On careful consideration of the above rival submissions, from the assessment order we observed that before the A.O. the assessee filed written submissions dated 14.12.2016, which reads as follows : 7 ITA.No.337/PAN./2018 Beiersdorf

SHRI NITIN A SHIRGURKAR,BELGAVI vs. PR. CIT, HUBBALI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowe

ITA 77/PAN/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 194A(3)(iv)Section 263Section 40

36,240/-. Subsequently the case was selected for limited scrutiny . Subsequently the case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. Thereafter the ld. AO issued notices u/s 1 under CASS. Thereafter the ld. AO issued notices u/s 142(1) of the Act and completed 42(1) of the Act and completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act, vide