Search: house property

2 results for “house property”+ Section 28clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 43(5)2 Section 362 Section 432 Section 2632 Section 402 Section 194A(3)(iv)2

BEIERSDORF INDIA (P) LTD.,PANAJI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4),, PANAJI

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 337/PAN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji17 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Sh D.E. Robinson, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh Ranjan Kumar, CIT-DR

Section 28Section 36Section 43Section 43(5)

28 of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Learned Counsel for the Assessee also placed reliance on the Judgment of Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Asian Financial Services Ltd., vs., CIT [2017] 8 ITR-OL 209 (Cal.) submitted that the loss was not a loss in speculative transaction. The loss could be set off against the profits

BEIERSDORF INDIA (P) LTD.,PANAJI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4),, PANAJI

BEIERSDORF INDIA (P) LTD.,PANAJI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4),, PANAJI

SHRI NITIN A SHIRGURKAR,BELGAVI vs. PR. CIT, HUBBALI