BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Natural Justiceclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,863Mumbai1,488Bangalore749Karnataka677Chennai389Jaipur346Ahmedabad237Kolkata226Hyderabad223Chandigarh186Telangana152Pune143Cochin93Indore89Raipur76Surat76Rajkot69Lucknow68Amritsar68Calcutta61Nagpur47Visakhapatnam42Cuttack42Patna41SC32Agra28Guwahati25Jodhpur25Rajasthan16Allahabad14Varanasi12Dehradun12Jabalpur11Kerala9Orissa6Panaji3Punjab & Haryana2Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2Ranchi2ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Himachal Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 1443Addition to Income3Natural Justice3Section 144C(5)2House Property2

SANGEETA SUNIL JOLAPURE,DAVORLIM, SALCETE, GOA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by assesse is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 293/PAN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji09 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos.293/Pan/2024 (A.Y. 2015-16) Sangeeta Sunil Jolapure, Vs National Faceless Saval Virgincar Classic, Assessment Centre, . Near Maruti Mandir,Davorlim, 2 Floor, F-Ramp, Salcete-403601, Jawaharlal Nehru Goa. Stadium, New Delhi-110003. Pan/Gir No. Admpj8290Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) Assessee By None(Letter Dated 7-4-2025) Revenue By Shri.Narendar Reddy..Sr.Dr

Section 144

house property as per ITS details of Rs.2,50,000/- were not offered for tax and explanations were called to substantiate the sources of deposit and were remain unexplained. Since, no explanations/details were filed, the AO considering the information available on record has invoked the provisions of Sec.144 of the Act and made additions and assessed the total income

EMGEE HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED,GOA vs. JCIT(A), KANPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 273/PAN/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed
ITAT Panaji
17 Mar 2025
AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos. 273/Pan/2024 (A.Y. 2017-18 ) Emgee Housing Private Vs Acit-Circle 1(1), Limited, Aaykar Bhavan, . 608, City Center Patto Plaza, Edc Complex, Panjim-403001, Patto Plaza, Goa. Panjim-403001, Goa. Pan .No.Aabce6688E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) Assessee By None(Letter 10-03-25) Revenue By Ms.Nazeera Mohamad.Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 11.03.2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 17.03.2025 Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assesse Against The Order Of The Addl/ Jcit(A) Kanpur Passed U/Sec 143(3) & U/Sec 250 Of The Act. 2. At The Time Of Hearing, It Was Found That There Is A Delay In Filing The Appeal Before The Hon’Ble Tribunal & The Assesse Has Filed An Affidavit For Condonation Of Delay. Whereas, The Facts Mentioned In The Affidavit Are Reasonable & Sufficient Cause Was Explained & The Ld. Dr Has No Specific Objections. Accordingly, We Condone The Delay & Admit The Appeal. The Assessee Has Raised

Section 23

property of Rs.1,99,08,000/- and also disallowed the expenses u/sec37(1) of the Act of Rs.4,31,468/- and finally assessed the total income of Rs.11,70,706/- and passed the order u/sec 143(3) of the Act dated 25.12.2019. 4. Aggrieved by the order, the assesse has filed an appeal before the CIT(A), whereas

ASHOK APPAJI PATIL,BELGAUM vs. INTL. TAXATION WARD, PANAJI, PANAJI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 49/PAN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji03 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A.No.49/Pan/2025 (A.Y.2016-17) Ashok Appaji Patil, Vs. I T O, 3338/1A,Sankalp International Taxation, Building, 3 Floor, Gondhalli Galli, Reac, Belagavi-590001, Panaji-403001, Karnataka. Goa. Pan/Gir No:Aqopp2917M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Letter Dt 1-07-2025. Respondent By : Smt.Rijula Uniyal.Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 02.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 03.07.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Assessing Officer Passed U/S 144 R.W.S 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Passed In Pursuance To The Directions Of The Dispute Resolution Panel (Drp) U/S 144C(5) Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised Grounds Of Appeal Challenging The Action Of Lower Authorities Drp/Ao Partly Sustaining The Addition Without Providing

For Appellant: Letter dt 1-07-2025For Respondent: Smt.Rijula Uniyal.Sr.DR
Section 144Section 144C(1)Section 144C(5)

property. The assessee has filed the explanations along with sources and housing loan with respect to purchase of two flats at Borivali Mumbai dealt at Para 5 to 7.4 of the order. Whereas the AO was not satisfied with the explanations in respect of Sources of purchases to the extent of Rs.42,00,000/- made an addition u/sec 69 & u/sec69A