BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Carry Forward of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,953Delhi787Kolkata368Karnataka276Bangalore240Chennai219Ahmedabad194Chandigarh182Jaipur170Pune100Raipur67Hyderabad66Cochin64Rajkot62Amritsar49Indore49Nagpur44Surat37Calcutta36Lucknow35Patna27Guwahati24SC21Telangana21Cuttack18Visakhapatnam16Jodhpur8Varanasi7Rajasthan3Panaji3Kerala2Allahabad2Agra2D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Andhra Pradesh1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Jabalpur1Himachal Pradesh1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 43(5)2Section 362Section 432Section 250(6)2Section 1322Section 133A2Disallowance2Addition to Income2Survey u/s 133A2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1), PANAJI vs. PRATEEK ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED, PANAJI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 75/PAN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji29 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No. 75/Pan/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri. Shrinivas Nayak, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Ranjan Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 250(6)

carried out on assessee on 03.06.2015. During the assessment year 2015-16, the assessee has entered into Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with M/s Vedarambh Property LLP dated 16.01.2015 towards liasoning, assisting & negotiating and getting surrendered of all rights so created due to negotiations in the land consisted of clearing the tenants and organizing and ensuring vacant and peaceful possession

M/S PRATEEK ALLOYS PVT. LTD.,PANAJI vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), PANAJI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 279/PAN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji29 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No. 75/Pan/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri. Shrinivas Nayak, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Ranjan Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 250(6)

carried out on assessee on 03.06.2015. During the assessment year 2015-16, the assessee has entered into Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with M/s Vedarambh Property LLP dated 16.01.2015 towards liasoning, assisting & negotiating and getting surrendered of all rights so created due to negotiations in the land consisted of clearing the tenants and organizing and ensuring vacant and peaceful possession

BEIERSDORF INDIA (P) LTD.,PANAJI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4),, PANAJI

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 337/PAN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji17 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Sh D.E. Robinson, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh Ranjan Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 28Section 36Section 43Section 43(5)

house was not able to clear our dues. The outstanding of Rs.4.8 crores against the broker’s name in effect represented the value of sales/closing stock as of the cut-off date due to the abrupt closure of trading on NSEL for no fault of the assessee. Let alone any connivance, the assessee did not even have any hint