Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

27 results for “disallowance”+ TDSclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,969 Delhi3,308 Chennai1,542 Bangalore1,514 Kolkata1,187 Ahmedabad516 Hyderabad412 Pune293 Jaipur261 Indore241 Chandigarh205 Cochin144 Raipur117 Lucknow115 Visakhapatnam115 Rajkot100 Karnataka98 Surat92 Nagpur72 Ranchi71 Cuttack70 Jodhpur52 Patna43 Guwahati35 Agra31 Panaji27 Amritsar26 Jabalpur26 Dehradun24 Telangana17 Calcutta17 Allahabad13 Kerala11 Varanasi5 SC5 Rajasthan4 Punjab & Haryana3 Gauhati1 Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 4034 Section 143(3)29 TDS24 Addition to Income24 Disallowance22 Section 194C20 Deduction20 Section 201(1)18 Section 143(1)6 Section 41(1)

TRIMURTI MINING SERVICES,MARGAO vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1, MARGAO

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 395/PAN/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 40Section 41(1)

disallowance on account of the assessee’s failure in deducting TDS on the corresponding payments involving vehicle hire charges. A perusal

RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKHANE NIYAMIT.,HUBLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD, BELGAUM., BELGAUM

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

Showing 1–20 of 27 · Page 1 of 2

5

Section 253(2)5

ITA 161/PAN/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 40

disallowance made by invoking the provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee shall prove before the A.O. that there is no amount left payable as on the year end and that all the amounts claimed on which the provisions of TDS

RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKHANE NIYAMIT.,HUBLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD, BELGAUM., BELGAUM

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 160/PAN/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 40

disallowance made by invoking the provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee shall prove before the A.O. that there is no amount left payable as on the year end and that all the amounts claimed on which the provisions of TDS

RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKHANE NIYAMIT.,HUBLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD, BELGAUM., BELGAUM

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 159/PAN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Jul 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 40

disallowance made by invoking the provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee shall prove before the A.O. that there is no amount left payable as on the year end and that all the amounts claimed on which the provisions of TDS

RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKHANE NIYAMIT.,HUBLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD, BELGAUM., BELGAUM

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 158/PAN/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Jul 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 40

disallowance made by invoking the provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee shall prove before the A.O. that there is no amount left payable as on the year end and that all the amounts claimed on which the provisions of TDS

RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKHANE NIYAMIT.,HUBLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BAGALKOT., BAGALKOT

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 157/PAN/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 40

disallowance made by invoking the provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee shall prove before the A.O. that there is no amount left payable as on the year end and that all the amounts claimed on which the provisions of TDS

RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKHANE NIYAMIT.,HUBLI vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1. BIJAPUR., BIJAPUR

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 154/PAN/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Jul 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 40

disallowance made by invoking the provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee shall prove before the A.O. that there is no amount left payable as on the year end and that all the amounts claimed on which the provisions of TDS

RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKHANE NIYAMIT.,HUBLI vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1. BIJAPUR., BIJAPUR

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 153/PAN/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Jul 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 40

disallowance made by invoking the provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee shall prove before the A.O. that there is no amount left payable as on the year end and that all the amounts claimed on which the provisions of TDS

RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKHANE NIYAMIT.,HUBLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BAGALKOT., BAGALKOT

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 155/PAN/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Jul 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 40

disallowance made by invoking the provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee shall prove before the A.O. that there is no amount left payable as on the year end and that all the amounts claimed on which the provisions of TDS

RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKHANE NIYAMIT.,HUBLI vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1. BIJAPUR., BIJAPUR

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 152/PAN/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Jul 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 40

disallowance made by invoking the provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee shall prove before the A.O. that there is no amount left payable as on the year end and that all the amounts claimed on which the provisions of TDS

VIVIDHA URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,SANKHLIM, BICHOLIM, GOA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), PANAJI

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 55/PAN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji19 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Sham KamatFor Respondent: Shri Prabhakar Anand DJ

Section 143(3)Section 251Section 40Section 80PSection 80P(4)

disallowance issue of Rs.70,07,948/- regarding non-deduction of TDS on interest payments involving term deposits exceeding Rs.10,000/-. Suffice

MAHALASA URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,PHONDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(3), PANAJI

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 56/PAN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji19 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 143(3)Section 251Section 40Section 80PSection 80P(4)

disallowance issue of Rs.42,73,878/- regarding non-deduction of TDS on interest payments involving term deposits exceeding Rs.10,000/-. Suffice

M/S R. S. SHETYE & BROS,PANAJI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1), PANAJI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 37/PAN/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji27 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. No.37/Pan/2023 (A.Y.2016-17) R.S.Shetye & Bros, Vs Acit 1(1), Flat.No.14, 1 St Floor, Aaykar Bhavan, . Trionara Apartments, Edc, Patto, New Muncipal Market, Panjim Panaji- Goa-403001. Goa-403001. Pan .No.Aabfr9785N (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent)

disallowance. The Ld.AR highlighted the ledger account copies of expenditure and TDS was deducted on the contractor payments and is not disputed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1), PANAJI vs. THE OLD GOA URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED, OLD GOA

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 175/PAN/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji24 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Sham KamatFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 143(3)Section 40Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of Rs.2,08,55,277/- on account of non-deduction of TDS regarding interest payments made to members, reading

PENTAIR WATER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,VERNA vs. JCIT, MARGAO RANGE, MARGAO

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 76/PAN/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji22 Aug 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing) Pentair Water India Pvt. Ltd., Vs Jcit, Margao Range, L-52-55, Verna Industrial Margao, Goa. Estate, Phase-Ii, Verna, Salcette, Goa. Pan: Aabcs 8856 L Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Rakesh Agrawal, Fca Revenue By : Shri N. Shrikanth, Dr Date Of Hearing : 16/08/2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 22/08/2023 O R D E R Per Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm: This Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Emanates From The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Panaji, Dated 16.03.2020 For A.Y.2009-10 As Per The Grounds Of Appeal On Record.

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Agrawal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth, DR

Section 154Section 234BSection 37Section 40

disallowance is not called for U/s 40(a) because there is no applicability of TDS on amounts which is not paid

TUMKUR MINERALS PVT. LTD,VASCO vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MARGAO RANGE, MARGAO

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 401/PAN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji20 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwalla, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Ashwini Hosmani, Sr.DR

Section 195Section 40Section 5Section 9(1)(vii)

TDS on this amount. The assessee was requested to explain why this amount should not be disallowed u/sec. 40(a). The assessee

SMT VANDANA SAMEER MAJALI,BELGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), BELGAVI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assesse is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 14/PAN/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji30 Jun 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos.14/Pan/2022 (A.Y. 2011-12 ) Smt Vandana Sameer Majali, Vs Ito-Ward-1(2), H.No.189/B1/A, Civil Hospital Road, . Shukrawar Peth, Belagavi-590001. Tilakwadi, Karnataka. Belagavi-590006, . Karnataka. . Pan .No. Apupm1202K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

TDS return and reply received from parties in lieu of notice u/sec133(6) of the Act, the A.O found certain irregularities in the claim and disallowed

VEERENDRA BASAVARAJ KOUJALAGI,BELAGAVI vs. CIRCLE 1 BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 289/PAN/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji10 Dec 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalei T A. No.289/Pan/2025 (A.Y.2010-11) Veerendra Basavarajkoujalagi Vs Ito-Circle 1, Shri. Laxmi Complex,1St Cross Chessonroad, . Apmc Road,Sadashivnagar, Dr.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-590001, Belagavi-590001. Karnataka. Karnataka. Pan .No. Agrpk3086D (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent)

TDS deductions, operation and maintenance charges of wind mill and confirmations. Whereas the Assessing officer has dealt on facts at Para 3 & 6 of the order and was not satisfied with the explanations and made additions/ disallowances

MRS VINI P. KENI,PANAJI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(3), PANAJI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 112/PAN/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji20 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos. 112/Pan/2022 (A.Y. 2014-15 ) Vini Prasad Keni, Vs Ito-Ward-1(3), Keni Building, Aayakar Bhavan, . Dr.Dada Vaidhya Road, Panaji-403001, Panjim-403001, Goa. Goa. . Pan .No. Adppk9767N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) Assessee By Shri D.E.Robinson.Ar Revenue By Sri Narender Reddy.Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 25.02.2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 20.03.2025 Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assesse Against The Order Of Nfac/ Cit(A) Passed U/Sec 143(3) & U/Sec 250 Of The Act. 2. At The Time Of Hearing, The Ld.Ar Of The Assessee Submitted That There Is A Delay Of 13 Days In Filing The Appeal Before The Hon’Ble Tribunal & The Assesse Has Filed The Affidavit For Condonation Of Delay. Whereas, The Facts Mentioned In The Affidavit Are Reasonable & The Ld. Dr Has No Specific Objections. Accordingly, We Condone The Delay & Admit The Appeal. The Assessee Has Raised

Section 14ASection 194CSection 40

disallowance u/sec14A r.w.r8D of IT rules of Rs.32,96,384/-(ii) The A.O found that the assesee has debited Rs,25,00,000/- in the profit & loss account towards reimbursement of processing and other mining expenses and the assessee has not deducted TDS

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI vs. M/S POTDAR BROTHERS, BELAGAVI

Appeals of the Revenue are PARTLY ALLOWED for statistical purposes in aforestated terms

ITA 179/PAN/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji18 Nov 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M Satish [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 132Section 133ASection 138Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 246ASection 250Section 253(2)

TDS and the Karagir had considered the same amount for taxation in his person income tax return. Thus, no cash was paid back to appellant. The chart below depicts the said contention of the appellant. The appellant also filed copies of ITR of these Karigars for year under consideration. 4.10 In view of the above discussion