BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 69Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,850Delhi745Jaipur215Kolkata214Chandigarh140Ahmedabad134Bangalore131Pune110Chennai108Surat98Indore84Hyderabad75Amritsar61Raipur38Rajkot36Visakhapatnam30Guwahati28Nagpur27Agra25Lucknow16Cochin15Calcutta8Cuttack8Jodhpur8Dehradun5Jabalpur5Ranchi4Varanasi3Patna3Panaji2Allahabad2Punjab & Haryana2Kerala2Telangana2Karnataka1Orissa1SC1

Key Topics

Section 69C4Addition to Income2

ALLAVUDDIN UMMARASAB HURAKADLI,MAPUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PANAJI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assesse is partly allowed

ITA 229/PAN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji18 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalei T A. No.229/Pan/2025 (A.Y. 2016-17 ) Allavuddin Unmarasab Vs National Faceless Hurakadli, Assessment Centre, H,No.354, New Delhi-110003 Shetty Wada, Mapusa-403507, Goa.

Section 69C

section 69C of the act and made addition of Rs.4,81,109/- as unexplained expenditure. 3. Further on the second disputed issue, the assesse has claimed deduction u/sec80C of the Act of Rs.1,50,000/- in respect of Housing loan repayment to The Jana Utkarsh Urban Coop credit Society Ltd. Whereas the A.O is of the view that the said

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2), BELAGAVI vs. SH. GIRISH PRAKASH VERNEKAR, BELAGAVI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the cross objection

ITA 228/PAN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji19 Dec 2018
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya, Am & Shri Ram Lal Negi, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Y. V. Raviraj
Section 132Section 147Section 69C

Section 148 for the said years. [E] During action U/S 132 on the Premise of RAJESH EXPORTS not a Single bill copy or any record on loose paper or any other evidence was found except alleged hard disk details fed by RAJESH EXPORTS. It is self serving evidence which has no evidentiary value. [F] HARD DISK seized was used against