BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 234B(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,623Delhi1,566Bangalore1,035Ahmedabad218Kolkata175Chennai165Jaipur141Hyderabad105Pune72Indore53Nagpur42Lucknow32Allahabad28Surat27Chandigarh23Agra20Karnataka20Rajkot19Ranchi16Raipur15Jodhpur12Dehradun8Visakhapatnam7Cochin7Cuttack6Patna6SC5Jabalpur4Guwahati2Panaji2Amritsar2Telangana1Varanasi1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 1549Section 143(3)4Section 2632Section 36(1)(iii)2Section 37(1)2Section 234B2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

ZUARI MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD.,GOA vs. DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1, MARGAO

ITA 85/PAN/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji06 Feb 2026AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliassessment Years: 2009-10 M/S Zuari Management Services Ltd. (Erstwhile Zuari Infrastructure & Developers Ltd., Formerly Zuari Sez Ltd.) Jai Kisaan Nagar, Zuari Nagar, Goa. Pan: Aaacz2903Q . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Margao, Goa. . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee By: Mr Salil Kapoor [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By: Mr Senthil Kumar N [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 29/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 06/02/2026 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; This Assessee’S Appeal Filed U/S 253(1) Of The Income-

For Appellant: Mr Salil Kapoor [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Senthil Kumar N [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 246ASection 250Section 253(1)Section 263Section 35DSection 36(1)(iii)
Section 37(1)

section 234B of the Act, as the tax payable after the additions is less than Rs.5,000/- and hence, no interest u/s 234B is chargeable. 3. We have heard rival party’s arguments & submissions and subject to rule 18 of Income Tax Appellate Rules, 1963 [‘ITAT-Rules’] perused the material placed on records and considered the facts in the light

M/S NAVRATNA JEWELLERS & CO.,GOKAK vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 1, GOKAK

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 301/PAN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji18 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri A.S. PatilFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth
Section 154Section 234B

Section 154. Therefore, there is no justification in disallowing Interest of Rs.2,36,126/-. Instead Commissioner [Appeals] confirmed the disallowance which is unjustified and requires to be deleted. [B] Learned Commissioner [Appeals] failed to appreciate that the appellant had not Revised the Income for the Assessment Year 2013-2014 claiming the Interest of Rs.2,36,126/-. Interest paid by appellant