BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “disallowance”+ Section 215clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai894Delhi709Chennai297Bangalore210Ahmedabad128Kolkata122Jaipur103Agra78Hyderabad74Chandigarh57Pune39Indore35Raipur32Surat31Rajkot28Visakhapatnam20Amritsar17Lucknow17Karnataka15Panaji11Jabalpur10Cochin9Jodhpur9Cuttack8SC8Guwahati6Telangana4Dehradun4Allahabad3Varanasi2Himachal Pradesh1Nagpur1Orissa1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Patna1Calcutta1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 80P24Section 80P(2)(a)24Deduction10Section 2506Section 1486Section 1476Section 1446Section 80P(2)6Section 2(19)6Disallowance

SHRI NITIN A SHIRGURKAR,BELGAVI vs. PR. CIT, HUBBALI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowe

ITA 77/PAN/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 194A(3)(iv)Section 263Section 40

disallowance, deduction, etc., it is incumbent upon the Commissioner not to exercise his suomotu revisional incumbent upon the Commissioner not to exercise his suomotu revisional incumbent upon the Commissioner not to exercise his suomotu revisional powers unless supported by adequate reasons for doing so; that if a query is nless supported by adequate reasons for doing so; that

5

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, BELAGAVI vs. M/S NIRANI SUGARS LIMITED, BELAGAVI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 178/PAN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji23 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Shri Ashok Kulkarni, AdvFor Respondent: Smt Rijula Uniyal, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(iii)

215 has clearly laid down that the claim in the return will tantamount to exercising of the 10 DCIT v. Nirani Sugars Ltd. option. In this case, we noted, the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal has held as under: “Section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with rule 5 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 - Depreciation - Allowance/Rate

SHRI BRAHMANATH CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMIT,NIPANI vs. ITO, WARD - 1 , NIPANI

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 41/PAN/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji24 Nov 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara

For Appellant: Shri Uday AmmangiFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikant
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 2(19)Section 80P(2)(a)

215 PIN 591 237 PAN AAAAM9208K (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Veeranna M Murgod For Revenue : Shri N. Shrikant Date of Hearing : 23.11.2022 ITA.No.5/PAN/2022 Assessment Year 2016-2017 Jai Hanuman Credit Souharda Sahakari Limited, 644, Jai Hanuman Building, The ACIT, Circle-2(1), Main Road, Ingali Village of vs. Chikodi Taluka, Karnataka. Belagavi. PIN 591 242 PAN AAAAJ3331Q (Appellant

SHRI MAHALAXMI CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI NIYAMIT,KUNNUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, NIPANI

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 49/PAN/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji24 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara

For Appellant: Shri Uday AmmangiFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikant
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 2(19)Section 80P(2)(a)

215 PIN 591 237 PAN AAAAM9208K (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Veeranna M Murgod For Revenue : Shri N. Shrikant Date of Hearing : 23.11.2022 ITA.No.5/PAN/2022 Assessment Year 2016-2017 Jai Hanuman Credit Souharda Sahakari Limited, 644, Jai Hanuman Building, The ACIT, Circle-2(1), Main Road, Ingali Village of vs. Chikodi Taluka, Karnataka. Belagavi. PIN 591 242 PAN AAAAJ3331Q (Appellant

JAI HANUMAN CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI LTD.,BELAGAVI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- 2(1), BELAGAVI

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 5/PAN/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji24 Nov 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara

For Appellant: Shri Uday AmmangiFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikant
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 2(19)Section 80P(2)(a)

215 PIN 591 237 PAN AAAAM9208K (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Veeranna M Murgod For Revenue : Shri N. Shrikant Date of Hearing : 23.11.2022 ITA.No.5/PAN/2022 Assessment Year 2016-2017 Jai Hanuman Credit Souharda Sahakari Limited, 644, Jai Hanuman Building, The ACIT, Circle-2(1), Main Road, Ingali Village of vs. Chikodi Taluka, Karnataka. Belagavi. PIN 591 242 PAN AAAAJ3331Q (Appellant

ITO, WARD - 2(1), MANGALURU vs. M/S S. K & UDUPI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE FISH MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED, MANGALURU

ITA 40/PAN/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji12 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali(Through Virtual Hearing) आयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.38 To 43/Pan/2022 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-13 To 2014-15 & 2016-17 To 2018-19

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

Section 80P(2)(a)(vii) of the Act wherein is clearly held that the individuals who contribute their labour or carry on the fishing or allied activities should not have restriction in voting rights. 5. For these and other grounds that may be urged upon, the order of the CIT(A) may be reversed.” ITAT-Pune Page

ITO, WARD - 2(1), MANGALURU vs. M/S S. K & UDUPI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE FISH MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED, MANGALURU

ITA 38/PAN/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji12 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali(Through Virtual Hearing) आयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.38 To 43/Pan/2022 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-13 To 2014-15 & 2016-17 To 2018-19

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

Section 80P(2)(a)(vii) of the Act wherein is clearly held that the individuals who contribute their labour or carry on the fishing or allied activities should not have restriction in voting rights. 5. For these and other grounds that may be urged upon, the order of the CIT(A) may be reversed.” ITAT-Pune Page

ITO, WARD - 2(1), MANGALURU vs. M/S S. K & UDUPI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE FISH MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED, MANGALURU

ITA 43/PAN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji12 Jul 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali(Through Virtual Hearing) आयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.38 To 43/Pan/2022 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-13 To 2014-15 & 2016-17 To 2018-19

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

Section 80P(2)(a)(vii) of the Act wherein is clearly held that the individuals who contribute their labour or carry on the fishing or allied activities should not have restriction in voting rights. 5. For these and other grounds that may be urged upon, the order of the CIT(A) may be reversed.” ITAT-Pune Page

ITO, WARD - 2(1), MANGALURU vs. M/S S. K & UDUPI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE FISH MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED, MANGALURU

ITA 41/PAN/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji12 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali(Through Virtual Hearing) आयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.38 To 43/Pan/2022 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-13 To 2014-15 & 2016-17 To 2018-19

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

Section 80P(2)(a)(vii) of the Act wherein is clearly held that the individuals who contribute their labour or carry on the fishing or allied activities should not have restriction in voting rights. 5. For these and other grounds that may be urged upon, the order of the CIT(A) may be reversed.” ITAT-Pune Page

ITO, WARD - 2(1), MANGALURU vs. M/S S. K & UDUPI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE FISH MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED, MANGALURU

ITA 42/PAN/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji12 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali(Through Virtual Hearing) आयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.38 To 43/Pan/2022 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-13 To 2014-15 & 2016-17 To 2018-19

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

Section 80P(2)(a)(vii) of the Act wherein is clearly held that the individuals who contribute their labour or carry on the fishing or allied activities should not have restriction in voting rights. 5. For these and other grounds that may be urged upon, the order of the CIT(A) may be reversed.” ITAT-Pune Page

ITO, WARD - 2(1), MANGALURU vs. M/S S. K & UDUPI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE FISH MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED, MANGALURU

ITA 39/PAN/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji12 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali(Through Virtual Hearing) आयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.38 To 43/Pan/2022 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-13 To 2014-15 & 2016-17 To 2018-19

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

Section 80P(2)(a)(vii) of the Act wherein is clearly held that the individuals who contribute their labour or carry on the fishing or allied activities should not have restriction in voting rights. 5. For these and other grounds that may be urged upon, the order of the CIT(A) may be reversed.” ITAT-Pune Page