BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 160(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,025Delhi987Bangalore327Chennai281Kolkata257Ahmedabad168Jaipur146Hyderabad112Raipur89Pune75Cochin73Rajkot58Indore44Surat42Allahabad31Nagpur31Chandigarh30Lucknow27Visakhapatnam24Jodhpur17Karnataka16Ranchi11Agra9SC8Amritsar7Kerala6Patna4Telangana3Calcutta3Guwahati3Cuttack2Panaji2Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1Orissa1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)6Section 2635Section 143(3)4Deduction2

M/S SOVA,PANAJI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI

The appeal of the assessee is PARTLY ALLOWED in aforestated terms

ITA 24/PAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji10 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliassessment Years: 2018-19 M/S Sova Salgaocar Bhavan, Altinho, Panaji, Goa-403001. Pan: Aacfs8862Q . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji, Goa. . . . . . . . Respondent

For Appellant: Mr Sukhsagar Syal [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M Satish [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 253(1)Section 263Section 56

160 Taxmann.com 91 (Del)]. We note that, during the pendency of revisionary proceeding before the Ld. PCIT, the jurisdictional assessing officer, the ITAT-Panaji Page 13 of 20 M/s Sova Vs PCIT ITA No. 024/PAN/2024 AY: 2018-19 Ld. Asstt Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1(1), Panaji Goa [‘Ld. AO’] vide notice dt. 30/11/2023 issued

MAHAVEER CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ALAGUR, BAGALKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2, BAGALKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 9/PAN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji10 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.09/Pan/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 Mahaveer Co-Operative Vs. Ito, Ward-2, Bagalkot. Credit Society Limited, Post : Alagur, Taluka : Jamakhandi, Dist. Bagalkot- 587301. Pan : Aabam6275F Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Pramod Y. Vaidya Revenue By : Shri N. Shrikanth Date Of Hearing : 09.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.11.2022 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Hubballi [‘The Cit(A)’] Dated 26.11.2018 For The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The Appellant Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law The Learned Cit(A) Erred In Disallowing The Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Of The Act, In Respect Of Income Earned From Associate Members/ Nominal Members. The Cit(A) Erred In Not Appreciating That — I) The Citizen’S Case Is Distinguishable On Facts As In The Present Case The Dealings Are With Members & There Are No Dealings With Public At Large.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Y. VaidyaFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the learned CIT(A) erred in disallowing the deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, in respect of income earned from Associate members/ Nominal members. The CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that — i) the Citizen’s case is distinguishable on facts as in the present