SHRI BASAVESHWAR PRATHAMIK KRISHI PATTIN SAHAKARI SANGHA N SUNADHOLI,SUNADHOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GOKAK

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 030/Pan/2025 Assessment Year : 2018-19 Shri Basaveshwar Prathamik Krishi Pattin Sahakari Sangha At Post: Sundholi, Ta.: Sundholi Dist. Belagavi.-591310 Pan : Aahas0468A . . . . . . . Appellant

section 80AC of the Act, however there was complete absence of authority vested with the Ld. CPC to carry out the disallowance u/s 143(1)(a)(v) of the Act. Therefore, the impugned action of denial of 80P deduction to the appellant by the Ld. CPC was barred by jurisdiction, hence unlawful. And in the absence of any explicit power

PRIYADARSHANI MAHILA CO-OP CR. SOCIETY LTD,BELAGAVI vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 032/Pan/2025 Assessment Year : 2019-20 Priyadarshani Mahila Co-Op. Society Ltd. At Post: Kognoli, Ta.: Nippani Dist. Belagavi. Pan : Aabap2582L . . . . . . . Appellant

3) of the Act. Since not all the returns pass through second mechanism but invariably passes through first mechanism, therefore the Ld. CPC rightly denied the claim while processing the return. 7. The subject matter of dispute regarding the power of LD. CPC to make disallowance was came before the co- ordinate bench in [ITA No 063/PAN/2025] ‘Allamaprabhu VUSS Niyamit

CENTRE FOR INCUBATION AND BUSINESS ACCELERATION,VERNA vs. CENTRALIZE PROCESSING CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos.152/Pan/2025 (A.Y.2024-25 ) Centre For Incubation & Vs. I T O- Exemption, Business Acceleration, Ward-1, Angel Charities, Pundalik Niwas, Angel Ashram, Panaji-403001, Verna, Salcete, Goa. Goa-403722. Pan/Gir No. Aafcc5621B (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) Appellant By Shri.Mahendra Gohel.Ar Revenue By Smt. Rijula Uniyal. Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 18.11.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 26.11.2025 Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm:

131/- by disallowing the claim of exemption u/sec 11 & u/sec11(2) of the Act. 3. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee has filed an appeal with the CIT(A), whereas the CIT(A) has considered the grounds of appeal, submissions of the assessee and findings of the AO and observed that the assessee has filed the return of income claiming

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI vs. M/S POTDAR BROTHERS, BELAGAVI

Appeals of the Revenue are PARTLY ALLOWED for statistical purposes in aforestated terms

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

3 of 16 M/s Potdar Brothers ITA Nos.175 to 177 & 179 to 180/PAN/2025 4.9 The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mehta Parikh & Co. Vs CIT 30 ITR 181 held as under; “ITA No.1375 to 1378/Bang/2016 "In the instant case a mere calculation of the nature indulged in by the ITO or the AAC was not enough, without

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI vs. M/S POTDAR BROTHERS, BELAGAVI

Appeals of the Revenue are PARTLY ALLOWED for statistical purposes in aforestated terms

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

3 of 16 M/s Potdar Brothers ITA Nos.175 to 177 & 179 to 180/PAN/2025 4.9 The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mehta Parikh & Co. Vs CIT 30 ITR 181 held as under; “ITA No.1375 to 1378/Bang/2016 "In the instant case a mere calculation of the nature indulged in by the ITO or the AAC was not enough, without

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI vs. M/S POTDAR BROTHERS, BELAGAVI

Appeals of the Revenue are PARTLY ALLOWED for statistical purposes in aforestated terms

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

3 of 16 M/s Potdar Brothers ITA Nos.175 to 177 & 179 to 180/PAN/2025 4.9 The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mehta Parikh & Co. Vs CIT 30 ITR 181 held as under; “ITA No.1375 to 1378/Bang/2016 "In the instant case a mere calculation of the nature indulged in by the ITO or the AAC was not enough, without

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELAGAVI vs. M/S POTDAR BROTHERS, BELAGAVI

Appeals of the Revenue are PARTLY ALLOWED for statistical purposes in aforestated terms

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

3 of 16 M/s Potdar Brothers ITA Nos.175 to 177 & 179 to 180/PAN/2025 4.9 The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mehta Parikh & Co. Vs CIT 30 ITR 181 held as under; “ITA No.1375 to 1378/Bang/2016 "In the instant case a mere calculation of the nature indulged in by the ITO or the AAC was not enough, without

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI vs. M/S POTDAR BROTHERS, BELAGAVI

Appeals of the Revenue are PARTLY ALLOWED for statistical purposes in aforestated terms

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

3 of 16 M/s Potdar Brothers ITA Nos.175 to 177 & 179 to 180/PAN/2025 4.9 The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mehta Parikh & Co. Vs CIT 30 ITR 181 held as under; “ITA No.1375 to 1378/Bang/2016 "In the instant case a mere calculation of the nature indulged in by the ITO or the AAC was not enough, without

THE HIND CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED,BELGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(2), BELAGAVI

The appeal of the assessee is ALLOWED

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali(Through Virtual Hearing From Pune) आयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 038/Pan/2023 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Hind Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd., 131, Hindwadi, Belgaum, Karnataka-590011 Pan: Aacat4514B . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिधम / V/S Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2), Belgaum . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वधरध / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr N. Shrikanth [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 07/08/2023 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 01/09/2023 आदेश / Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; Against The Impugned Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2022- 23/1048023500(1) Dt. 15/12/2022 Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereafter] By National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’ Hereafter] The Present Appeal Is Instituted U/S 253(1) Of The Act For Assessment Year 2017-18 [‘Ay’ Hereinafter].

131, Hindwadi, Belgaum, Karnataka-590011 PAN: AACAT4514B . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिधम / V/s Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2), Belgaum . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वधरध / Appearances Assessee by : Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by : Mr N. Shrikanth [‘Ld. DR’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusive Hearing : 07/08/2023 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 01/09/2023 आदेश / ORDER PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI, AM; Against