M/S SOVA,PANAJI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI
The appeal of the assessee is PARTLY ALLOWED in aforestated terms
ITA 24/PAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji10 Mar 2026AY 2018-19
Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliassessment Years: 2018-19 M/S Sova Salgaocar Bhavan, Altinho, Panaji, Goa-403001. Pan: Aacfs8862Q . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji, Goa. . . . . . . . Respondent
For Appellant: Mr Sukhsagar Syal [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M Satish [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 253(1)Section 263Section 56
disallowing them in the absence of business operations. The action of Ld. PCIT therefore also find support by negative application of decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional Bombay High Court in the case of ‘CIT Vs Gabriel India Ltd’ [1993, 203 ITR 108
(Bom)], wherein their hon’ble lordships at para 14
have held as under;
‘We, therefore hold that