ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI vs. M/S SOCIADADE DE FOMENTO INDUSTRIAL P. LTD, MARGAO

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and that of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

10-15 years without any borrowings. When we analyse the facts and circumstances of the present case, we clearly noted that on the issue involved in the present case, the AO has noted certain reason to dislodge the contention of the assessee in para 3 of the assessment order (supra) and, thereafter, by relying on the judgements

SOCIEADADE DE FOMENTO INDL. PVT. LTD.,MARGAO vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MARGAO RANGE, MARGAO

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and that of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

10-15 years without any borrowings. When we analyse the facts and circumstances of the present case, we clearly noted that on the issue involved in the present case, the AO has noted certain reason to dislodge the contention of the assessee in para 3 of the assessment order (supra) and, thereafter, by relying on the judgements

SHRI NITIN A SHIRGURKAR,BELGAVI vs. PR. CIT, HUBBALI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowe

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

10%) Rs.80,72,228 Rs.8,11,007 Rs.1,63,847 Rs.1,63,847 Contract (1%) Rs.13,77,717 Rs.15,585 Rs.5919 Consultancy Rs.33,95,000 Rs.39,500 Rs.1,527 Total Rs.98,44,945 As per the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, As per the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1, UDUPI vs. M/S MANIPAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, MANIPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2013-14 Dcit, Circle-1, Udupi M/S. Manipal Technologies Limited, Vs. Udayavani Building, Manipal- 576104. Pan: Aabcm 9516 H (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Smt. Sheetal Borkar, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Mayur Kamble, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 13.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.06.2022 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: The Present Appeal Filed By The Department Is Arising Out Of The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Mangaluru In Appeal No. Ita No. 10030/Udp/Cit(A)Mng/2016-17 Dated 27.11.2017 Against The Order Of Dcit, Circle- 1, Udupi Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Dated 29.03.2016. 2. There Are Six Grounds Of Appeal Taken By The Department In The Present Appeal, All Of Which Relate To The Disallowance Made U/S 14A Of The Act R.W.R. 8D(2)(Ii) & 8D(2)(Iii) Of The Income-Tax Rules, 1962 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Rules), Amounting To Rs. 1,61,65,201/-.

10(34) of the Act. In the course of assessment proceeding, ld. AO noted that assessee has not disallowed any amount towards expenses incurred in relation to earning the said exempted income. Ld. AO show caused the assessee to explain as to why a disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D should not be made, in response to which

GANGADHAR NARSINGDAS AGRAWAL (HUF),MARGAO vs. ASSTT. COMM. OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1, MARGAO

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2011-12 M/S. Gangadhar Narsingdas Assistant Commissioner Of Agrawal (Huf) Income-Tax, Circle-1, 1St Floor, Anand Bhavan, Vs. Margao-Goa. Old Station Rod, Margao- Goa 403601 (Pan: Aabhg4804R) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri Nishant Thakkar, Advocate Respondent By : Shri Mayur Kamble, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 16.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 30.08.2022 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A), Panaji-1 Vide Ita No. 42/Mrg/2014-15 Dated 16.03.2018 For A.Y. 2011-12 Passed Against The Assessment Order U/S 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) By Acit, Circle-1, Margao, Goa Dated 25.03.2014. 2. Shri Nishant Thakkar, Advocate Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee & Shri Mayur Kamble, Sr. Dr Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue.

25,423/- as exempt u/s. 10(34) of the Act. Ld. AO also noted from the Balance Sheet of the assessee, the details of investment made by the assessee in various mutual funds, which is tabulated as under: Particulars AY 2010-11 (Rs.) AY 2011-12 (Rs.) SBI SHF liquid Plus 56,299,080.34 0.00 SBI Magnum Insta Cash Fund

INFRASTRUCTURE LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.,DONA PAULA vs. JOINT COMM. OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 1, PANAJI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 380/Pan/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Infrastructure Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Cidade De Goa, Vainguinim Beach, Dona Paula, Goa-403 004. Pan : Aaaci9107R .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Panaji-Goa, ……""यथ" / Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 381/Pan/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, Panaji-Goa, .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

10 Infrastructure Logistics Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos.380 & 381/PAN/2017 assessee in reference to its books of account had dislodged the same and mechanically computed the disallowance under the aforesaid statutory provision by triggering the mechanism contemplated in Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Rules. In support of his aforesaid contention that before taking recourse to Sec. 14A(2) and triggering

ASSTT. COMM. OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI vs. INFRASTRUCTURE LOGISTICS PVT. LTD., DONA PAULA

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 380/Pan/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Infrastructure Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Cidade De Goa, Vainguinim Beach, Dona Paula, Goa-403 004. Pan : Aaaci9107R .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Panaji-Goa, ……""यथ" / Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 381/Pan/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, Panaji-Goa, .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

10 Infrastructure Logistics Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos.380 & 381/PAN/2017 assessee in reference to its books of account had dislodged the same and mechanically computed the disallowance under the aforesaid statutory provision by triggering the mechanism contemplated in Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Rules. In support of his aforesaid contention that before taking recourse to Sec. 14A(2) and triggering

SHREE AMBEY FORGING PRIVAT LIMITED,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - (4), PANAJI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

10 CCB in support of deduction u/s 80 IA alongwith past assessment history and orders for the earlier assessment years, wherein this issue has been discussed and allowed by the respective Assessing Officers. A detailed justification for deduction claimed u/s 80 IA which gives the entire history and background alongwith all the notification and approval granted by various governmental authorities

SCORPIO IRON LTD,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - 1(4), PANAJI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

10 CCB in support of deduction u/s 80 IA alongwith past assessment history and orders for the earlier assessment years, wherein this issue has been discussed and allowed by the respective Assessing Officers. A detailed justification for deduction claimed u/s 80 IA which gives the entire history and background alongwith all the notification and approval granted by various governmental authorities

M/S CHOWGULE AND COMPANY (SALT) PVT. LTD,MORMUGAO vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2, MARGAO

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of aforesaid observation

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D. Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. : 390/Pan/2017 करधििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013 M/S Chowgule & Company (Salt) Pvt Ltd., Chowgule House, Mormugao Harbour, Goa – 403803. Pan: Aabcc 5595 J . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिाम / V/S Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Margao, Goa. . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Ms Hiral Sejpal Revenue By : Shri Sourabh Nayak सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 29/04/2022 आदेश / Order Per Jamlappa D Battull Am; The Present Appeal Filed By The Appellant Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- Appeals, Panaji-1 [For Short “Cit(A)”] Dt. 09/10/2017 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which In Turn Tousled Out Of Order Of Assessment Of Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-Circle-2, Margoa [For Short “Ao”] Dt. 27/07/2014 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act, For The Assessment Year [For Short “Ay”] 2012-2013. Itat-Panaji Page 1 Of 23

10) The Learned CIT(A) has erred in upholding that the appellant has failed to establish how exempt income is earned without incurring expenditure when in fact the circumstances in which such income is earned is already submitted on record. ITAT-Panaji Page 3 of 23 M/s Chowgule and Company (Salt) Pvt Ltd ITA No.: 390/PAN/2017, AY : 2012-2013, AABCC5595J

VGM EXPORT,VASCO vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MARGAO

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 114/Pan/2023 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Vgm Export Suvarn Bandekar Building, Swatantra Path, Vasco, Goa Pan : Aaafv6197P . . . . . . . Applicant V/S Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Margao Range, Margao. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Mr P B Deshpande [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ravindra Hattalli [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 20/02/2025 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 25/02/2025

25,000/- disallowance u/s 14A of the Act r.w.r. 8D2(iii) of Income Tax Rules, 1962 [‘IT-Rules’ hereinafter] (b) ₹37,27,447/- disallowance u/s 40(a) r.w.s. 195 of the Act for non-deduction of tax at source from sampling charges paid to Hongkong Party and (c) ₹1,14,11,643/- disallowance of forex fluctuation loss claimed in respect

M/S SHREE BALAJI CONCEPTS,MARGAO vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTERNATIONAL TXATION), WARD -1, PANAJI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No. 73/Pan/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13

10 Crores on 17/09/2011. The appellant while making the payment towards purchase of the property did not deduct TDS as per the provisions of section 195 of the Act under a bonafide belief that the said sellers of the property were residents as per the Income-tax Act. Noticing the non-deduction of TDS as per section

M/S SIDDHARTH NATURAL FOOD RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED,KUNDAIM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1), PANAJI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.187/Pan/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. Siddharth Natural Food Resources Private Limited, Plot No.83, Kundaim Industrial Estate, Kundaim, Panaji- 403001. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Aalcs5815K बनाम / V/S. Acit, Circle-2(1), ……""यथ" / Respondent Panaji. Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Sourabh Nayak सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09.11.2021 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 12.11.2021 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Panaji (‘Cit(A)’ For Short) Dated 08.02.2017 For The Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. The Appellant Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1) The Order Of The Learned Cit(A) Is Bad In Law & Is Void-Ab-Initio. 2) The Assessment Order Passed By The Ld.Ao U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, Is Without Jurisdiction & Bad In Law. 3) The Ld.Cit(A) Has Erred In Sustaining The Disallowance Of Rs.3,35,25,800/- Made By The Ao, Whereas The Deduction Claimed By The Assessee U/S 80Ib Was Only Rs.50,00,194/-. 4) The Ld Ao Has Erred In Disallowing The Profit As Per Profit & Loss Account Of Rs.3,35,25,800/- Whereas The Profit As Per The Income Tax Act, 1961 Was Only Rs.50,00,194/- Which Was Claimed As Deduction U/S 80Ib In The Return Of Income Filled By The Assessee. Hence The Maximum Addition By Way Of Disallowance Of Assessee Claim Of Deduction U/S 80Ib Can Be Only Rs.50,00,194/-.

25,800/- denying the claim of deduction u/s 80IB(11A) of the Act on the ground that (i) the assessee had not been engaged the process of producing vegetables or fruits as it is engaged in the business of pasteurized of milk and its sale; (ii) the business of dairy products was eligible for deduction under sub-section

BELLAD BAGEWADI KRISHI SEVA SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED,HUKKERI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, GOKAK

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshalistay Application Nos.01, 02 & 03/Pan./2023 Arising Out Of Ita.Nos.11, 89 & 116/Pan./2022 Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2020-2021 Along With Ita.Nos.11, 89 & 116/Pan./2022 Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2020-2021 & Ita.Nos. 05 & 06/Pan./2020 Assessment Years 2007-2008 & 2008-2009 Bellad Bagewadi Krishi Seva The Income Tax Officer, Sahakari Sangh Bellad Ward-1, Bagewadi, Taluka Hukkeri, Dr. Ghogeri Building, Dist. Belagavi – 591 305 Vs. Belgaum Road, State Of Karnataka. Gokak – 591 307. Pan Aaaat0640C State Of Karnataka (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Shivanand Halbhavi For Revenue : Shri N. Shrikanth Date Of Hearing : 10.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2023 Order

25% of its net profit into a reserve fund. This is an obligatory regulation to be followed by a Society to carry on its activities. As such the CIT (A) should have refrained from disallowing the claim of the 9 ITA.Nos.11, 89 & 116/PAN./2022 S.A.Nos.01, 02 & 03/PAN./2023 & ITA.Nos.05 & 06/PAN./2020 appellant U/s. 80P(2)(d). Alternatively

BELLAD BAGEWADI KRISHI SEVA SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED,HUKKERI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, GOKAK

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshalistay Application Nos.01, 02 & 03/Pan./2023 Arising Out Of Ita.Nos.11, 89 & 116/Pan./2022 Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2020-2021 Along With Ita.Nos.11, 89 & 116/Pan./2022 Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2020-2021 & Ita.Nos. 05 & 06/Pan./2020 Assessment Years 2007-2008 & 2008-2009 Bellad Bagewadi Krishi Seva The Income Tax Officer, Sahakari Sangh Bellad Ward-1, Bagewadi, Taluka Hukkeri, Dr. Ghogeri Building, Dist. Belagavi – 591 305 Vs. Belgaum Road, State Of Karnataka. Gokak – 591 307. Pan Aaaat0640C State Of Karnataka (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Shivanand Halbhavi For Revenue : Shri N. Shrikanth Date Of Hearing : 10.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2023 Order

25% of its net profit into a reserve fund. This is an obligatory regulation to be followed by a Society to carry on its activities. As such the CIT (A) should have refrained from disallowing the claim of the 9 ITA.Nos.11, 89 & 116/PAN./2022 S.A.Nos.01, 02 & 03/PAN./2023 & ITA.Nos.05 & 06/PAN./2020 appellant U/s. 80P(2)(d). Alternatively

BELLAD BAGEWADI KRISHI SEVA SAHAKARI SSANGH NIYAMIT,HUKKERI vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshalistay Application Nos.01, 02 & 03/Pan./2023 Arising Out Of Ita.Nos.11, 89 & 116/Pan./2022 Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2020-2021 Along With Ita.Nos.11, 89 & 116/Pan./2022 Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2020-2021 & Ita.Nos. 05 & 06/Pan./2020 Assessment Years 2007-2008 & 2008-2009 Bellad Bagewadi Krishi Seva The Income Tax Officer, Sahakari Sangh Bellad Ward-1, Bagewadi, Taluka Hukkeri, Dr. Ghogeri Building, Dist. Belagavi – 591 305 Vs. Belgaum Road, State Of Karnataka. Gokak – 591 307. Pan Aaaat0640C State Of Karnataka (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Shivanand Halbhavi For Revenue : Shri N. Shrikanth Date Of Hearing : 10.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2023 Order

25% of its net profit into a reserve fund. This is an obligatory regulation to be followed by a Society to carry on its activities. As such the CIT (A) should have refrained from disallowing the claim of the 9 ITA.Nos.11, 89 & 116/PAN./2022 S.A.Nos.01, 02 & 03/PAN./2023 & ITA.Nos.05 & 06/PAN./2020 appellant U/s. 80P(2)(d). Alternatively

BELLAD BAGEWADI KRISHI SEVA SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT,BELAGAVI vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshalistay Application Nos.01, 02 & 03/Pan./2023 Arising Out Of Ita.Nos.11, 89 & 116/Pan./2022 Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2020-2021 Along With Ita.Nos.11, 89 & 116/Pan./2022 Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2020-2021 & Ita.Nos. 05 & 06/Pan./2020 Assessment Years 2007-2008 & 2008-2009 Bellad Bagewadi Krishi Seva The Income Tax Officer, Sahakari Sangh Bellad Ward-1, Bagewadi, Taluka Hukkeri, Dr. Ghogeri Building, Dist. Belagavi – 591 305 Vs. Belgaum Road, State Of Karnataka. Gokak – 591 307. Pan Aaaat0640C State Of Karnataka (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Shivanand Halbhavi For Revenue : Shri N. Shrikanth Date Of Hearing : 10.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2023 Order

25% of its net profit into a reserve fund. This is an obligatory regulation to be followed by a Society to carry on its activities. As such the CIT (A) should have refrained from disallowing the claim of the 9 ITA.Nos.11, 89 & 116/PAN./2022 S.A.Nos.01, 02 & 03/PAN./2023 & ITA.Nos.05 & 06/PAN./2020 appellant U/s. 80P(2)(d). Alternatively

BELLAD BAGEWADI KRISHI SEVA SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED,HUKKERI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, GOKAK

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshalistay Application Nos.01, 02 & 03/Pan./2023 Arising Out Of Ita.Nos.11, 89 & 116/Pan./2022 Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2020-2021 Along With Ita.Nos.11, 89 & 116/Pan./2022 Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2020-2021 & Ita.Nos. 05 & 06/Pan./2020 Assessment Years 2007-2008 & 2008-2009 Bellad Bagewadi Krishi Seva The Income Tax Officer, Sahakari Sangh Bellad Ward-1, Bagewadi, Taluka Hukkeri, Dr. Ghogeri Building, Dist. Belagavi – 591 305 Vs. Belgaum Road, State Of Karnataka. Gokak – 591 307. Pan Aaaat0640C State Of Karnataka (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Shivanand Halbhavi For Revenue : Shri N. Shrikanth Date Of Hearing : 10.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2023 Order

25% of its net profit into a reserve fund. This is an obligatory regulation to be followed by a Society to carry on its activities. As such the CIT (A) should have refrained from disallowing the claim of the 9 ITA.Nos.11, 89 & 116/PAN./2022 S.A.Nos.01, 02 & 03/PAN./2023 & ITA.Nos.05 & 06/PAN./2020 appellant U/s. 80P(2)(d). Alternatively

THE KHANAPUR vs. S SANGH LTD,BELGAUMVS.PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HUBBALI

Appeal is allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

25% of its net profit into a reserve fund. This is an obligatory regulation to be followed by a Society to carry on its activities. As such the CIT (A) should have refrained from disallowing the claim of the appellant U/s. 80P(2)(d). Alternatively, since the said interest income is attributable to carrying on the business of the appellant