Search: condonation of delay

34 results for “condonation of delay”+ Unexplained Investmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Condonation of Delay32 Section 143(3)10 Addition to Income5 Section 14A4 Section 1313 Section 693 Unexplained Investment3 Section 142(1)2 Section 253(1)

FAROOK SHAIKH,NORTH GOA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), NORTH GOA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 406/PAN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji03 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalei T A. Nos. 406/Pan/2025 (A.Y.2016-17) Farook Shaikh, National Faceless Vs H.No.961, Assessment Centre, . Near Syndicate Bank, New Delhi-110003. Sanquelim, North Goa-403505, Goa. Pan.No.Fstps6016N (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) Assessee By Shri.Sanket Bakshi.Ar Revenue By Smt.Rijula Uniyal.Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 29.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 03.02.2026 Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assesse Against The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) Delhi / Cit(A) Passed U/Sec147 R,W,S144 & U/Sec 250 Of The Act. The Assesse Has Raised The Grounds Of Appeal Challenging The Order Of The Cit(A) In Not Condoning The Delay In Filling The Appeal & Sustaining The Addition Of Unexplained Investment U/Sec69 Of The Act By The Assessing Officer. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That, The Assessee Is In Employment Outside India & Has Not Filed The Return Of Income. The Assessing Officer (Ao) Based On The Information From Ddit(Inv) Bangalore In Respect Of Search

Section 144Section 69

condoning the delay in filling the appeal and sustaining the addition of unexplained investment u/sec69 of the Act by the Assessing

Showing 1–20 of 34 · Page 1 of 2

FAROOK SHAIKH,NORTH GOA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), NORTH GOA

FAROOK SHAIKH,NORTH GOA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), NORTH GOA

DAMODAR MANGALJI & COMPANY LIMITED,PANAJI vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 1, PANAJI

DAMODAR MANGALJI & COMPANY LIMITED,PANAJI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1), PANAJI

JAGDISH SAVANT,BELGAUM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BELGAUM

M/S SADANAND BHAVAN,GOKAK vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, GOKAK

KUMTA ADIKE MARATA SOPUHARDA SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT,KUMTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2, KARWAR

SHRI BASAVESHWAR URBAN CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTRE, BELAGAVI

SHRI BASAVESHWAR URBAN CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT, BELAGAVI

BASAV SOUHARDA CREDIT SAHAKARI NIYAMIT BAILHONGAL,BAILHONGALA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTER, BELAGAVI

VPK URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY,MARDOL, PONDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PANAJI

PRATHAMIK KRISHI PATTIN SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT LTD BHOJ,BHOJ vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, NIPANI

VPK URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY,MARDOL, PONDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PANAJI, GOA

VPK URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY,MARDOL, PONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT, NEAC, DELHI

THE MARATHA URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,BELGAUM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 5, BELGAUM

SHREE BASVANNA MAHADEV CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6, BELGAUM

VIVIDODDSHESHA PRATHAMIK GRAMEEN KRUSHI SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT SOUDATTI,SOUDATTI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-4, BELGAUM, BELGAUM

HAVYAKA CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITA,KUMTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KARWAR

SHRI JAI JINENDRA CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LIMITED,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 NIPANI, BELAGAVI

SHRI JAI JINENDRA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT,BELAGAVI vs. NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTRE, BELAGAVI

VARDHAMAN URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,BELGAUM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4 BELGAUM, BELGAUM