BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 481clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka102Mumbai43Chennai42Delhi40Kolkata27Cuttack14Bangalore12Jaipur11Hyderabad11Ahmedabad8Visakhapatnam5Chandigarh5Surat4Panaji3Cochin3Telangana3Pune3Patna2Lucknow2SC2Andhra Pradesh1Dehradun1Amritsar1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 12A10Section 2(15)4Section 12A(1)(ac)2Section 80G(5)(iii)2Section 80G2Charitable Trust2Exemption2Addition to Income2Limitation/Time-bar

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALORE

Appeals stands Allowed

ITA 233/PAN/2025[12AB]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji06 Mar 2026

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 233 & 234/Pan/2025 Yakshit Yuva Foundation O/O Taekwondo Master Rao, 1St Fl, Gadekar Complex, P B Road, Kakati S.O., Belagavi. Pan : Aaaty9435D . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bangalore. . . . . . . . Respondent

For Appellant: Mr Shreepada Ravi Rao [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

481 ITR 215 (SC)], the Hon’ble Supreme Court approved and affirmed the judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court [2024, 298 Taxman 650 (Bom)], in which their hon’ble lordships condoned the delay considering the history of compliance, bonafide professional error and in the absence of any malafides on the part of assessee. ITAT-Panaji Page

2

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

Appeals stands Allowed

ITA 234/PAN/2025[80G]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji06 Mar 2026

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 233 & 234/Pan/2025 Yakshit Yuva Foundation O/O Taekwondo Master Rao, 1St Fl, Gadekar Complex, P B Road, Kakati S.O., Belagavi. Pan : Aaaty9435D . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bangalore. . . . . . . . Respondent

For Appellant: Mr Shreepada Ravi Rao [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

481 ITR 215 (SC)], the Hon’ble Supreme Court approved and affirmed the judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court [2024, 298 Taxman 650 (Bom)], in which their hon’ble lordships condoned the delay considering the history of compliance, bonafide professional error and in the absence of any malafides on the part of assessee. ITAT-Panaji Page

SUVERNAKARAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,HONAVAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 KARWAR, KAARWAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 159/PAN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji20 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalei T A. Nos159/Pan/2025 (A.Y. 2017-18) Suvernakarr Cooperative Vs Ito-Ward-1, Society Ltd, Santerikrupa, . Kintalkeri, Kaigaroad, Honavar, Habbuwada, Uttara Kannada-581334, Karwar-581306, Karnataka. Karnataka. Pan.No. Aaaas1927M (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent)

Section 80P

condone the delay and admit the appeal. 3. The brief facts of the case are that, the assessee is a cooperative credit society engaged in providing credit facilities to its members. The assesse has filed the return of income for the A.Y 2017-18 on 07.11.2017 disclosing a total income of Rs.79,740/- after claiming deduction u/sec