BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “condonation of delay”+ Section 207clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai204Karnataka101Delhi58Bangalore57Mumbai44Raipur41Kolkata39Chandigarh26Jaipur22Ahmedabad19Hyderabad16Cuttack12Surat9Pune6Visakhapatnam5Jabalpur5Rajkot5Lucknow4SC3Guwahati3Nagpur3Amritsar2Ranchi2Patna2Telangana1Varanasi1Jodhpur1Dehradun1Panaji1Cochin1Andhra Pradesh1Rajasthan1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3Section 250(6)2

PRIYA PRASAD SHIRODKAR,CALANGUTE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), PANAJI, PANAJI

ITA 53/PAN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji08 Apr 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 053/Pan/2025 Assessment Year : 2020-21 Priya Prasad Shirodkar H.No. 4/96, Prabhuwaddo, Calangute, Goa Pan : Akipg9924D . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Panaji, Goa. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : None For The Assessee Revenue By : Mr Narendra Reddy [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 07/04/2025 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 08/04/2025 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; The Captioned Appeal Of The Assessee Impugns Din & Order 1065516948(1) Dt. 10/06/2024 Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Ld. Nfac’ Hereinafter] U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereinafter] Which In Turn Arisen Out Of Order Of Assessment Dt. 26/09/2022 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act By The National Faceless E-Asstt. Centre, Delhi [‘Ld. Nfeac’ Hereinafter] Anent To Assessment Year 2020-21 [‘Ay’ Hereinafter].

For Appellant: None for the AssesseeFor Respondent: Mr Narendra Reddy [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 250(6)Section 251(1)(a)Section 251(2)
Section 253(3)

207 days. From the reasons stated in the affidavit we are of the considered view that, the assessee for a ITAT-Panaji Page 1 of 4 Priya Prasad Shirodkar Vs ITO ITA Nos.053/PAN/2025 AY: 2020-21 sufficient reasons was prevented from filing the present appeal within the prescribed limit terms of section 253(3) of the Act. Consequently, applying