BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 2(24)(x)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai266Delhi217Mumbai170Kolkata143Karnataka100Jaipur95Chandigarh90Bangalore82Nagpur67Raipur48Hyderabad44Calcutta37Pune36Ahmedabad35Lucknow32Indore25Surat22Cuttack19SC15Visakhapatnam14Amritsar10Telangana9Cochin9Varanasi6Guwahati5Allahabad5Jodhpur4Panaji4Patna2Orissa2Rajkot2Agra2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Rajasthan1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 153A16Section 246A8Section 253(1)4Section 2504Section 153C4Section 1324Addition to Income4Natural Justice4Limitation/Time-bar

CHITTIBABU GHANTA,GOA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI, GOA

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 278/PAN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Ajaykumar V. [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 246ASection 250Section 253(1)

x,xx,xxx/- by way of undisclosed commission income. 3. The appellant craves leave to add to or amend any of the grounds of appeal, if deemed necessary. 5. Even if it was not been brought to notice of the bench or pleaded by the respondent Revenue, in view of the mandatory guiding principle laid down of Hon’ble Apex

4
Condonation of Delay4

CHITTIBABU GHANTA,GOA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI, GOA

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 279/PAN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Ajaykumar V. [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 246ASection 250Section 253(1)

x,xx,xxx/- by way of undisclosed commission income. 3. The appellant craves leave to add to or amend any of the grounds of appeal, if deemed necessary. 5. Even if it was not been brought to notice of the bench or pleaded by the respondent Revenue, in view of the mandatory guiding principle laid down of Hon’ble Apex

CHITTIBABU GHANTA,PANAJI, GOA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI, GOA

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 280/PAN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Ajaykumar V. [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 246ASection 250Section 253(1)

x,xx,xxx/- by way of undisclosed commission income. 3. The appellant craves leave to add to or amend any of the grounds of appeal, if deemed necessary. 5. Even if it was not been brought to notice of the bench or pleaded by the respondent Revenue, in view of the mandatory guiding principle laid down of Hon’ble Apex

CHITTIBABU GHANTA,PANAJI, GOA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI, GOA

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 281/PAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Ajaykumar V. [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 246ASection 250Section 253(1)

x,xx,xxx/- by way of undisclosed commission income. 3. The appellant craves leave to add to or amend any of the grounds of appeal, if deemed necessary. 5. Even if it was not been brought to notice of the bench or pleaded by the respondent Revenue, in view of the mandatory guiding principle laid down of Hon’ble Apex