Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 164clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 114 Section 12A4 Condonation of Delay4 Section 80P(2)(a)3 Deduction3 Disallowance3 Revision u/s 2633 Section 82 Section 119(2)(b)

DEARHOOD FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 202/PAN/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji23 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalei T A. No.202/Pan/2025 (A.Y.2022-23 ) Dear Hood Foundation, Ddit, Vs. Plot.No.1/S,Kanbargi Cpc, Industrial Area, Bengaluru-560500. Kanabargi.S.O, Karnataka. Belgaum-590015, Karnataka. Pan/Gir No. Aaicd1005D (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) Appellant By Shri.Pramod Y Vaidya.Ar Revenue By Shri.Sanket Deshmukh.Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 23.12.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 23.12.2025 Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm:

Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 8

164 days in filing the appeal before the Hon’ble Tribunal and the assesse has filed an affidavit for condonation of delay. 2 DearHood Foundation. Whereas, the facts mentioned in the affidavit are reasonable and the Ld. DR has no specific objections. Accordingly, condone the delay and admit the appeal. 3. The Brief facts of the case are that

DEARHOOD FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

DEARHOOD FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

RAJA BHAT AND KUMUDA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , BELAGAVI

SHRI JINNAPPANNA CHOUGULE LALBAHADUR CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT,BELGAUM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BELGAUM

SHRI JINNAPPANNA CHOUGULE LALBAHADUR CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT,BELGAUM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BELGAUM

SHRI JINNAPPANNA CHOUGULE LALBAHADUR CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT,2471, LALBAHADUR AKKAMAHADEVI CHOWK, SHIRGUPPI ATH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BELGAUM