FAROOK SHAIKH,NORTH GOA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), NORTH GOA
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 406/PAN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji03 Feb 2026AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalei T A. Nos. 406/Pan/2025 (A.Y.2016-17) Farook Shaikh, National Faceless Vs H.No.961, Assessment Centre, . Near Syndicate Bank, New Delhi-110003. Sanquelim, North Goa-403505, Goa. Pan.No.Fstps6016N (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) Assessee By Shri.Sanket Bakshi.Ar Revenue By Smt.Rijula Uniyal.Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 29.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 03.02.2026 Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assesse Against The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) Delhi / Cit(A) Passed U/Sec147 R,W,S144 & U/Sec 250 Of The Act. The Assesse Has Raised The Grounds Of Appeal Challenging The Order Of The Cit(A) In Not Condoning The Delay In Filling The Appeal & Sustaining The Addition Of Unexplained Investment U/Sec69 Of The Act By The Assessing Officer. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That, The Assessee Is In Employment Outside India & Has Not Filed The Return Of Income. The Assessing Officer (Ao) Based On The Information From Ddit(Inv) Bangalore In Respect Of Search
Section 144Section 69
condoning the delay in filling the appeal and sustaining the addition of unexplained investment u/sec69 of the Act by the Assessing Officer.
2. The brief facts of the case are that, the assessee is in employment outside India and has not filed the return of income.
The Assessing
Officer
(AO) based on the information from DDIT(Inv) Bangalore in respect