BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai114Chennai95Delhi94Kolkata94Bangalore73Jaipur72Hyderabad52Raipur45Chandigarh33Rajkot26Patna21Surat17Pune16Visakhapatnam16Ahmedabad10Nagpur8Indore7Lucknow7Cuttack7Cochin5Kerala4Panaji4SC3Jabalpur2Allahabad2Karnataka1Ranchi1Guwahati1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)9Section 194A9Section 133A7Section 1316Section 2016Section 143(3)4Deduction4Addition to Income4Survey u/s 133A4

UNION BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, TDS CIRCLE, PANAJI, PANAJI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 169/PAN/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji14 Jan 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr C Naresh [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Ms Rijjula Uniyal [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 131Section 133ASection 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250Section 253(1)

133A of the Act on the assessee branch on 03/10/2017 to 04/10/2017. The survey/spot verification revealed certain discrepancies in compliance of applicable provisions of Chapter XVII of the Act, which were confronted to the assessee branch for negation. ITAT-Panaji Page 3 of 30 Union Bank Of India (Erstwhile Corporation Bank) Vs DCIT ITA No. 169 to 171/PAN/2025 4.2 Considering

Section 253(1)3
Section 2503
TDS3

UNION BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, TDS CIRCLE, PANAJI, PANAJI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 171/PAN/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji14 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr C Naresh [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Ms Rijjula Uniyal [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 131Section 133ASection 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250Section 253(1)

133A of the Act on the assessee branch on 03/10/2017 to 04/10/2017. The survey/spot verification revealed certain discrepancies in compliance of applicable provisions of Chapter XVII of the Act, which were confronted to the assessee branch for negation. ITAT-Panaji Page 3 of 30 Union Bank Of India (Erstwhile Corporation Bank) Vs DCIT ITA No. 169 to 171/PAN/2025 4.2 Considering

UNION BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, TDS CIRCLE, PANAJI, PANAJI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 170/PAN/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji14 Jan 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr C Naresh [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Ms Rijjula Uniyal [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 131Section 133ASection 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250Section 253(1)

133A of the Act on the assessee branch on 03/10/2017 to 04/10/2017. The survey/spot verification revealed certain discrepancies in compliance of applicable provisions of Chapter XVII of the Act, which were confronted to the assessee branch for negation. ITAT-Panaji Page 3 of 30 Union Bank Of India (Erstwhile Corporation Bank) Vs DCIT ITA No. 169 to 171/PAN/2025 4.2 Considering

M/S SADANAND BHAVAN,GOKAK vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, GOKAK

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 49/PAN/2026[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji01 Apr 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Gd Padmahshalii T A. No.49/Pan/2026 (A.Y. 2013-14) M/S Sadanand Bhavan, The Income Tax Cts No. 3205 Opp. Bus Vs. Office Ward 1, Stand Road Gokak, Gokak, Karnataka -591307. Karnataka-591307. Pan .No.Aapfs8051G (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent)

Section 115BSection 131Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 69Section 69A

condone the delay and admit the appeal. 3. The brief facts of the case that, the assessee is a partnership firm engaged in business of manufacturing and sale of karadant/sweet. The assessee has filed the return of income for the A.Y. 2013-14 on 18-03-2014 disclosing a total income of Rs.14,64,500/- subsequently, the case was selected