Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 13(2)(h)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 12A10 Section 2(15)4 Section 12A(1)(ac)2 Section 80G(5)(iii)2 Section 80G2 Charitable Trust2 Exemption2 Addition to Income2 Limitation/Time-bar

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

Appeals stands Allowed

ITA 234/PAN/2025[80G]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji06 Mar 2026

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 233 & 234/Pan/2025 Yakshit Yuva Foundation O/O Taekwondo Master Rao, 1St Fl, Gadekar Complex, P B Road, Kakati S.O., Belagavi. Pan : Aaaty9435D . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bangalore. . . . . . . . Respondent

For Appellant: Mr Shreepada Ravi Rao [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

condone the same, we deem it fit to vacate the first premise of delay in filing applications as founded in rejecting the impugned applications by the Ld. CIT(E). Ergo ordered accordingly. ITAT-Panaji Page 9 of 22 Yakshit Yuva Foundation Vs CIT(E) ITA Nos.233 & 234/PAN/2025 15. Now coming to merits of the case; we observed that, in rejecting

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALORE