BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Carry Forward of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai534Kolkata425Chennai241Delhi167Ahmedabad152Pune152Hyderabad128Chandigarh99Bangalore90Jaipur89Raipur73Surat66Amritsar48Rajkot47Visakhapatnam40Calcutta39Cuttack38Nagpur34Lucknow26Indore25Guwahati17Patna16SC14Cochin11Varanasi10Allahabad8Karnataka7Jodhpur6Dehradun5Telangana4Panaji3Agra2Jabalpur1Andhra Pradesh1Himachal Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4Section 145A2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, BELGAVI vs. SHREE BHAGYALAXMI SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKHANE NIYAMIT, BELAGAVI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 66/PAN/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji22 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Pravin Ghali, ARFor Respondent: Shri Badrinath Yamaji
Section 143(3)

condone the delay in filing the appeal and the matter was heard on merits. 3. The brief facts in this case are that assessee filed its return of income for A.Y. 2013-14 on 31/07/2013, declaring total income of Rs.NIL after setting off of brought forward losses. The assessee’s main source of income is lease rent received from

THE RAIBAG TALUKA PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED,BELGAVI vs. ITO, WARD - 2(2), BELGAUM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 349/PAN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji31 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 349/Pan/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-2013 The Raibag Taluka Primary Co-Operative Agriculture & Rural Development Bank Limited Raibag, Tal. Raibag, Dist. Belgavi. Pan : Aaaat4138K .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(2), Belgavi ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Shivanand Halbhavi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 80P

losses). The return of income filed by the assessee society was initially processed as such u/s. 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment u/s. 143(2) of the Act. Assessment was thereafter framed by the Assessing Officer vide his order passed u/s.143(3) of the Act, dated 31.07.2014, wherein after making

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), PATTO PLAZA vs. ESTEEM INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, PLOT

ITA 253/PAN/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji30 Jun 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavankumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Mahendra Sanghvi [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Capt. Pradeep Arya [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 250Section 253Section 44A

Delay (if considered) is condoned and advanced accordingly. ITAT-Panaji Page 2 of 20 DCIT Vs Esteem Industries Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos.253/PAN/2024 AY: 2012-13 4. Succinctly stated facts of the case are that; the assessee an incorporated company and engaged in manufacturing of surfactants & speciality chemicals. The assessee company filed its return of income on 27/09/2012 declaring total income