BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 28clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi606Mumbai584Karnataka537Bangalore342Chennai335Jaipur182Ahmedabad181Pune122Kolkata115Hyderabad88Chandigarh78Lucknow67Cochin54Amritsar52Surat47Cuttack39Indore37Visakhapatnam36Rajkot30Nagpur22Calcutta18Telangana17Agra16Allahabad16Jodhpur13SC11Kerala8Varanasi7Raipur6Dehradun6Patna6Rajasthan4Punjab & Haryana4Ranchi3Panaji3Andhra Pradesh2Jabalpur2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 12A15Section 2(15)4Section 80G3Exemption3Section 12A(1)(ac)2Section 80G(5)(iii)2Charitable Trust2Addition to Income2Limitation/Time-bar

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALORE

Appeals stands Allowed

ITA 233/PAN/2025[12AB]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji06 Mar 2026

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 233 & 234/Pan/2025 Yakshit Yuva Foundation O/O Taekwondo Master Rao, 1St Fl, Gadekar Complex, P B Road, Kakati S.O., Belagavi. Pan : Aaaty9435D . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bangalore. . . . . . . . Respondent

For Appellant: Mr Shreepada Ravi Rao [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

section 2(15) of the Act. 25. It remain an undisputed fact that, the appellant trust in the course of imparting ‘Taekwondo Training and self-defence training’ also charging nominal fees from one class of the student over underprivileged student to whom such training was provided free of cost. But this ispo-facto do not disqualify the appellant for grant

2

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

Appeals stands Allowed

ITA 234/PAN/2025[80G]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji06 Mar 2026

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 233 & 234/Pan/2025 Yakshit Yuva Foundation O/O Taekwondo Master Rao, 1St Fl, Gadekar Complex, P B Road, Kakati S.O., Belagavi. Pan : Aaaty9435D . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bangalore. . . . . . . . Respondent

For Appellant: Mr Shreepada Ravi Rao [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

section 2(15) of the Act. 25. It remain an undisputed fact that, the appellant trust in the course of imparting ‘Taekwondo Training and self-defence training’ also charging nominal fees from one class of the student over underprivileged student to whom such training was provided free of cost. But this ispo-facto do not disqualify the appellant for grant

ANIL SALGAONCAR FOUNDATION,PANAJI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 421/PAN/2018[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji10 Jan 2019AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya, Am & Shri Ram Lal Negi, Jm

For Appellant: Shri P. J. PardiwallaFor Respondent: Shri Y. V. Raviraj
Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 80GSection 80G(5)(vi)

charitable in nature and as per objectives. (ii) Investment clause was not in order as it permitted investments in name of trustees even when full details of investments made were before him and which were held in the name of appellant trust. (iii) The winding up clause was not in order as it empowered the trustees to misuse funds even