AMAZING GRACE CHARITABLE TRUST,GOA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE

In the result, the two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos. 282 & 283/Pan/2024 (A.Y. 2024-25) Amazing Grace Charitable Vs Cit (Exemptions), Unity Building Annex, Trust. Hno.725, . Mission Road, Stanthonyvaddo,Reachout, Bangalore-560027, Sonarbath,Guirim, Karnataka. Bardez-403507, Goa. . Pan .No. Aaita7122B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Assessee By Smt.Neeru Agnihotri.Ar Revenue By Shri.Captain Pradeep Arya.Cit Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 05.03.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 06.03.2025 Order Per Bench: The Assessee Has Filed These Two Appeals Against The Separate Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions)(Cit(E)), Bangalore Passed (I) U/Sec12A Of The Act Dated21-09-2024 & (Ii) U/Sec80G Of The Act Dated 21-09-2024. 2.The Assessee Has Raised The Grounds Of Appeal Challenging The Orders Of The Cit(E) Rejecting The Amazing Grace Charitable Trust.. Application Filed For (I) Registration U/Sec12Ab Of The Act. & (Ii) Approval U/Sec80(5) Of The Act.

charitable activities as per the registered trust deed dated 15-03- 2021.The assesse was granted provisional registration under section 12AB and U/sec80G(5) of the Act in Form.no.10AC.Subsequently, as per the amended, provisions of section 12AB & u/sec80G of the Act, The assessee for the purpose of permanent registration has uploaded separate e-applications in Form.No.10AB on 24

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALORE

Appeals stands Allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 233 & 234/Pan/2025 Yakshit Yuva Foundation O/O Taekwondo Master Rao, 1St Fl, Gadekar Complex, P B Road, Kakati S.O., Belagavi. Pan : Aaaty9435D . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bangalore. . . . . . . . Respondent

charitable activities as defined in section 2(15) of the Act. In the course of hearing the Ld. DR Mr Zain while relying on the impugned order bottled-up the denial by adding that such training centre is in the nature of commercial establishment therefore cannot even sheltered in residuary limb ‘the advancement of any other object of public utility

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

Appeals stands Allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 233 & 234/Pan/2025 Yakshit Yuva Foundation O/O Taekwondo Master Rao, 1St Fl, Gadekar Complex, P B Road, Kakati S.O., Belagavi. Pan : Aaaty9435D . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bangalore. . . . . . . . Respondent

charitable activities as defined in section 2(15) of the Act. In the course of hearing the Ld. DR Mr Zain while relying on the impugned order bottled-up the denial by adding that such training centre is in the nature of commercial establishment therefore cannot even sheltered in residuary limb ‘the advancement of any other object of public utility

SHRI RAMPURUSH MANDIR SOCIETY,CUNCOLIM vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, CPC, BANGALORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 75 & 76/Pan/2025 Assessment Year : 2021-22 & 2022-23 Shri Rampurush Mandir Society Veroda, Cuncolim, Salcete, Goa-403703. Pan : Aadas9268E . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Cpc, Bengaluru. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Mr Narcinva Lotlikar [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ish Gupta [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 25/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 26/08/2025 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; The Twin Appeals Of The Appellant Assessee Impugns Separate Din & Orders Both Dt. 10/03/2025 Passed By The Addl./Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeals(2), Kolkata [‘Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac’ Hereinafter] U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereinafter] Which In Turn Emanated Out Of Respective Summary Assessment Dt. 23/09/2022 & 16/03/2023 Passed U/S 143(1) Of The Act By The National Faceless E-Asstt Centre [‘Ld. Ao’ Hereinafter] Anent To Assessment Years 2021- 22 & 2022-23 [‘Ays’ Hereinafter].

24)(iia) of the Act, therefore in our considered view such income clearly attracts the provisions of s/s (2) of section 164 of the Act, thus disentitles the appellant AOP from claiming normal rate of taxation in respect to part of former income returned by it in the respective assessment years. ITAT-Panaji Page 14 of 18 Shri Rampurush Mandir

SHRI RAMPURUSH MANDIR SOCIETY,CUNCOLIM vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX - CPC, BANGALORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 75 & 76/Pan/2025 Assessment Year : 2021-22 & 2022-23 Shri Rampurush Mandir Society Veroda, Cuncolim, Salcete, Goa-403703. Pan : Aadas9268E . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Cpc, Bengaluru. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Mr Narcinva Lotlikar [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ish Gupta [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 25/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 26/08/2025 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; The Twin Appeals Of The Appellant Assessee Impugns Separate Din & Orders Both Dt. 10/03/2025 Passed By The Addl./Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeals(2), Kolkata [‘Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac’ Hereinafter] U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereinafter] Which In Turn Emanated Out Of Respective Summary Assessment Dt. 23/09/2022 & 16/03/2023 Passed U/S 143(1) Of The Act By The National Faceless E-Asstt Centre [‘Ld. Ao’ Hereinafter] Anent To Assessment Years 2021- 22 & 2022-23 [‘Ays’ Hereinafter].

24)(iia) of the Act, therefore in our considered view such income clearly attracts the provisions of s/s (2) of section 164 of the Act, thus disentitles the appellant AOP from claiming normal rate of taxation in respect to part of former income returned by it in the respective assessment years. ITAT-Panaji Page 14 of 18 Shri Rampurush Mandir