BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 139(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka451Mumbai301Delhi252Chennai197Bangalore139Kolkata98Pune90Ahmedabad88Jaipur83Hyderabad74Chandigarh61Cochin59Lucknow33Indore30Amritsar28Allahabad21Calcutta18Nagpur15Rajkot15Cuttack15Surat12Visakhapatnam11Telangana9Dehradun9Jodhpur8Agra7Raipur5Patna4Ranchi4Rajasthan3Jabalpur3Varanasi3SC2Punjab & Haryana2Guwahati2Panaji2Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 11(1)(a)12Section 12A5Section 113Exemption2

RAJA BHAT AND KUMUDA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , BELAGAVI

The appeal of the assessee is ALLOWED

ITA 270/PAN/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji19 Mar 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliassessment Year : 2022-23 Raja Bhat & Kumuda Foundation Plot No. 4, Rs No1368, Kumudini, Sadashiv Nagar, Belgavi-590001 Pan:Aajcr6351B . . . . . . . Appellant

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr S Manikandan [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 246A(1)Section 250Section 253(1)Section 8

5 of 16 Raja Bhat & Kumuda Foundation Vs ITO ITA No.0270/PAN/2024 AY:2022-23 7. We note that, non-compliance of provisions of sub-clause (ii) of clause (b) of section 12A was the solitary reason which persuaded the Revenue to deny the exemption to the appellant. In doing so the Revenue contends that, the audit report subject to extension

MINERAL FOUNDATION OF GOA,PANAJI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE - 1, MANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 120/PAN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji04 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Ketan Ved, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Rijula Uniyal, Sr. DR
Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250(6)

139/-. Accordingly calculated the deduction u/s 11(1)(a) at the rate of 15% which is amount to Rs.31,67,421/-. On other hand the assessee calculated the deduction u/s 11(1)(a) amount of Rs.60,65,330/- on gross income. The assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) and the Ld. CIT(A) upheld the order