SHRI RAMPURUSH MANDIR SOCIETY,CUNCOLIM vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, CPC, BANGALORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 75 & 76/Pan/2025 Assessment Year : 2021-22 & 2022-23 Shri Rampurush Mandir Society Veroda, Cuncolim, Salcete, Goa-403703. Pan : Aadas9268E . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Cpc, Bengaluru. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Mr Narcinva Lotlikar [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ish Gupta [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 25/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 26/08/2025 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; The Twin Appeals Of The Appellant Assessee Impugns Separate Din & Orders Both Dt. 10/03/2025 Passed By The Addl./Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeals(2), Kolkata [‘Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac’ Hereinafter] U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereinafter] Which In Turn Emanated Out Of Respective Summary Assessment Dt. 23/09/2022 & 16/03/2023 Passed U/S 143(1) Of The Act By The National Faceless E-Asstt Centre [‘Ld. Ao’ Hereinafter] Anent To Assessment Years 2021- 22 & 2022-23 [‘Ays’ Hereinafter].

b) ‘as to whether surcharge at the highest rate applies to the appellant society when its income is charged to tax @MMR owning to application of provisions of section 164/167B r.w.s 2(29C) of the Act?’ 10. We shall first test the applicability of provisions of section 167B of the Act which verbatimly reads as under; Charge of tax where

SHRI RAMPURUSH MANDIR SOCIETY,CUNCOLIM vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX - CPC, BANGALORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 75 & 76/Pan/2025 Assessment Year : 2021-22 & 2022-23 Shri Rampurush Mandir Society Veroda, Cuncolim, Salcete, Goa-403703. Pan : Aadas9268E . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Cpc, Bengaluru. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Mr Narcinva Lotlikar [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ish Gupta [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 25/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 26/08/2025 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; The Twin Appeals Of The Appellant Assessee Impugns Separate Din & Orders Both Dt. 10/03/2025 Passed By The Addl./Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeals(2), Kolkata [‘Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac’ Hereinafter] U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereinafter] Which In Turn Emanated Out Of Respective Summary Assessment Dt. 23/09/2022 & 16/03/2023 Passed U/S 143(1) Of The Act By The National Faceless E-Asstt Centre [‘Ld. Ao’ Hereinafter] Anent To Assessment Years 2021- 22 & 2022-23 [‘Ays’ Hereinafter].

b) ‘as to whether surcharge at the highest rate applies to the appellant society when its income is charged to tax @MMR owning to application of provisions of section 164/167B r.w.s 2(29C) of the Act?’ 10. We shall first test the applicability of provisions of section 167B of the Act which verbatimly reads as under; Charge of tax where

FABRICA DA IGREJA DE PARRA,PARRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD - 1, PANAJI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 220 & 221/Pan/2025 Fabrica Da Igreja De Parra C/O, St. Annee Church Parra, Bardez, North Goa-403510 Pan : Aaatf2744C . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Panaji . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Ms Jinita Chatterjee [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Azar Zain [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 11/02/2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 13/02/2026 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; By Present Twin Appeals, The Assessee Impugns Separate Orders Of Rejection Passed U/S 12Ab(3) Of The Income Tax Act [In Short ‘The Act’] By The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bengaluru [In Short ‘Cit(E)’] Vide Din & Order No. Itba/Exm/F/Exm45/2025- 16/1077247685(1) Dt. 20/06/2025 & 1077646854(1) Dt. 24/06/2025. Itat-Panaji Page 1 Of 9

trust established in accordance with applicable law & in operation as such [Constitution/Establishment] (b) whether all the entries of object clause are in consonance with the ‘charitable purpose’ as defined by section 2(15) of the Act [Objects] (c) whether there exist any implied or express provision in the constitutional & other administrative ITAT-Panaji Page 6 of 9 Fabrica Da Igreja

FABRICA DA IGREJA DE PARRA,PARRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION) WARD -1, PANAJI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 220 & 221/Pan/2025 Fabrica Da Igreja De Parra C/O, St. Annee Church Parra, Bardez, North Goa-403510 Pan : Aaatf2744C . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Panaji . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Ms Jinita Chatterjee [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Azar Zain [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 11/02/2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 13/02/2026 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; By Present Twin Appeals, The Assessee Impugns Separate Orders Of Rejection Passed U/S 12Ab(3) Of The Income Tax Act [In Short ‘The Act’] By The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bengaluru [In Short ‘Cit(E)’] Vide Din & Order No. Itba/Exm/F/Exm45/2025- 16/1077247685(1) Dt. 20/06/2025 & 1077646854(1) Dt. 24/06/2025. Itat-Panaji Page 1 Of 9

trust established in accordance with applicable law & in operation as such [Constitution/Establishment] (b) whether all the entries of object clause are in consonance with the ‘charitable purpose’ as defined by section 2(15) of the Act [Objects] (c) whether there exist any implied or express provision in the constitutional & other administrative ITAT-Panaji Page 6 of 9 Fabrica Da Igreja

CONFRARIA DE N SRA DO ROSARIO DA CAPELA DE NEURA,NEURA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

trust established in accordance with applicable Indian Law & in operation as such [Constitution/Establishment] (b) whether all the entries of object clause are in consonance with the ‘charitable purpose’ as defined by section 2(15) of the Act [Objects] (c) whether there exist any implied or express provision in the constitutional & other administrative documents/policies etc., entitling any right or power

CONFRARIA DO SSMO SACRAMENTO E N SRA DE AMPARO DA IGREJA DE MANDUR,MANDUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

trust established in accordance with applicable Indian Law & in operation as such [Constitution/Establishment] (b) whether all the entries of object clause are in consonance with the ‘charitable purpose’ as defined by section 2(15) of the Act [Objects] (c) whether there exist any implied or express provision in the constitutional & other administrative documents/policies etc., entitling any right or power

CONFRERIA DE N SRA DO BOM SUCCESSO DA CAPELA DE DONGORIM MANDUR,MANDURA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

trust established in accordance with applicable Indian Law & in operation as such [Constitution/Establishment] (b) whether all the entries of object clause are in consonance with the ‘charitable purpose’ as defined by section 2(15) of the Act [Objects] (c) whether there exist any implied or express provision in the constitutional & other administrative documents/policies etc., entitling any right or power

CONFRARIA DO SSMO SACRAMENTO E SANTOS REIS MAGOS DA IGREJA DE REISMAGOS,VEREM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

trust established in accordance with applicable Indian Law & in operation as such [Constitution/Establishment] (b) whether all the entries of object clause are in consonance with the ‘charitable purpose’ as defined by section 2(15) of the Act [Objects] (c) whether there exist any implied or express provision in the constitutional & other administrative documents/policies etc., entitling any right or power

COFRE DA CAPELA DE S SEBASTIAO NEURA,NEURA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

trust established in accordance with applicable Indian Law & in operation as such [Constitution/Establishment] (b) whether all the entries of object clause are in consonance with the ‘charitable purpose’ as defined by section 2(15) of the Act [Objects] (c) whether there exist any implied or express provision in the constitutional & other administrative documents/policies etc., entitling any right or power

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

Appeals stands Allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 233 & 234/Pan/2025 Yakshit Yuva Foundation O/O Taekwondo Master Rao, 1St Fl, Gadekar Complex, P B Road, Kakati S.O., Belagavi. Pan : Aaaty9435D . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bangalore. . . . . . . . Respondent

B Road, Kakati S.O., Belagavi. PAN : AAATY9435D . . . . . . . Appellant V/s The Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption, Bangalore. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee by : Mr Shreepada Ravi Rao [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by : Mr Azar Zain [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive Hearing : 12/02/2026 Date of Pronouncement : 06/03/2026 ORDER PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI; The present twin appeals of the assessee are assailed against twin orders

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALORE

Appeals stands Allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 233 & 234/Pan/2025 Yakshit Yuva Foundation O/O Taekwondo Master Rao, 1St Fl, Gadekar Complex, P B Road, Kakati S.O., Belagavi. Pan : Aaaty9435D . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bangalore. . . . . . . . Respondent

B Road, Kakati S.O., Belagavi. PAN : AAATY9435D . . . . . . . Appellant V/s The Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption, Bangalore. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee by : Mr Shreepada Ravi Rao [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by : Mr Azar Zain [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive Hearing : 12/02/2026 Date of Pronouncement : 06/03/2026 ORDER PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI; The present twin appeals of the assessee are assailed against twin orders

SHRI MAHARUDRA HANUMAN NYASA,PORVORIM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. No.346/Pan/2025 Shri.Maharudra Hanuman Vs Cit (Exemptions), Nyasa, Unity Buildingannexe, . M 60, Housing Board Colony, Mission Read, Alto Porvorim, Bengaluru-560027, Bardez, North Goa-403521, Karnataka. Goa. Pan .No. Aagts6084E (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) Assessee By Shri.Prashanth Jain.Ar Revenue By Shri.Satish.M.Cit-Dr

b)(ii) of the Act. The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the order of the CIT(E) rejecting the application filed for registration u/sec12AB of the Act. 2. The brief facts of the case are that, the assessee is a trust and is undertaking charitable activities. The assesse was granted provisional registration under section 12AB