SHRI RAMPURUSH MANDIR SOCIETY,CUNCOLIM vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, CPC, BANGALORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 75 & 76/Pan/2025 Assessment Year : 2021-22 & 2022-23 Shri Rampurush Mandir Society Veroda, Cuncolim, Salcete, Goa-403703. Pan : Aadas9268E . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Cpc, Bengaluru. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Mr Narcinva Lotlikar [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ish Gupta [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 25/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 26/08/2025 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; The Twin Appeals Of The Appellant Assessee Impugns Separate Din & Orders Both Dt. 10/03/2025 Passed By The Addl./Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeals(2), Kolkata [‘Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac’ Hereinafter] U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereinafter] Which In Turn Emanated Out Of Respective Summary Assessment Dt. 23/09/2022 & 16/03/2023 Passed U/S 143(1) Of The Act By The National Faceless E-Asstt Centre [‘Ld. Ao’ Hereinafter] Anent To Assessment Years 2021- 22 & 2022-23 [‘Ays’ Hereinafter].

addition . . . . (Emphasis supplied) ITAT-Panaji Page 15 of 18 Shri Rampurush Mandir Society Vs CPC ITA Nos.75 & 76/PAN/2025 AY: 2021-22 & 2022-23 17. By the landmark decision the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of ‘CIT Vs SK Patel Family Trust’ [2017 TaxPub 1099 (SC)] settled issue of taxation @MMR on whole of the income of the discretionary

SHRI RAMPURUSH MANDIR SOCIETY,CUNCOLIM vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX - CPC, BANGALORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 75 & 76/Pan/2025 Assessment Year : 2021-22 & 2022-23 Shri Rampurush Mandir Society Veroda, Cuncolim, Salcete, Goa-403703. Pan : Aadas9268E . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Cpc, Bengaluru. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Mr Narcinva Lotlikar [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ish Gupta [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 25/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 26/08/2025 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; The Twin Appeals Of The Appellant Assessee Impugns Separate Din & Orders Both Dt. 10/03/2025 Passed By The Addl./Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeals(2), Kolkata [‘Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac’ Hereinafter] U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereinafter] Which In Turn Emanated Out Of Respective Summary Assessment Dt. 23/09/2022 & 16/03/2023 Passed U/S 143(1) Of The Act By The National Faceless E-Asstt Centre [‘Ld. Ao’ Hereinafter] Anent To Assessment Years 2021- 22 & 2022-23 [‘Ays’ Hereinafter].

addition . . . . (Emphasis supplied) ITAT-Panaji Page 15 of 18 Shri Rampurush Mandir Society Vs CPC ITA Nos.75 & 76/PAN/2025 AY: 2021-22 & 2022-23 17. By the landmark decision the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of ‘CIT Vs SK Patel Family Trust’ [2017 TaxPub 1099 (SC)] settled issue of taxation @MMR on whole of the income of the discretionary

AMAZING GRACE CHARITABLE TRUST,GOA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE

In the result, the two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos. 282 & 283/Pan/2024 (A.Y. 2024-25) Amazing Grace Charitable Vs Cit (Exemptions), Unity Building Annex, Trust. Hno.725, . Mission Road, Stanthonyvaddo,Reachout, Bangalore-560027, Sonarbath,Guirim, Karnataka. Bardez-403507, Goa. . Pan .No. Aaita7122B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Assessee By Smt.Neeru Agnihotri.Ar Revenue By Shri.Captain Pradeep Arya.Cit Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 05.03.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 06.03.2025 Order Per Bench: The Assessee Has Filed These Two Appeals Against The Separate Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions)(Cit(E)), Bangalore Passed (I) U/Sec12A Of The Act Dated21-09-2024 & (Ii) U/Sec80G Of The Act Dated 21-09-2024. 2.The Assessee Has Raised The Grounds Of Appeal Challenging The Orders Of The Cit(E) Rejecting The Amazing Grace Charitable Trust.. Application Filed For (I) Registration U/Sec12Ab Of The Act. & (Ii) Approval U/Sec80(5) Of The Act.

Income Tax (Exemptions)(CIT(E)), Bangalore passed (i) U/sec12A of the Act dated21-09-2024 and (ii) u/sec80G of the Act dated 21-09-2024. 2.The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the orders of the CIT(E) rejecting the Amazing Grace Charitable trust.. application filed for (i) registration u/sec12AB of the Act. And (ii) approval u/sec80

AMAZING GRACE CHARITABLE TRUST,GOA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), BENGALURU

In the result, the two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos. 282 & 283/Pan/2024 (A.Y. 2024-25) Amazing Grace Charitable Vs Cit (Exemptions), Unity Building Annex, Trust. Hno.725, . Mission Road, Stanthonyvaddo,Reachout, Bangalore-560027, Sonarbath,Guirim, Karnataka. Bardez-403507, Goa. . Pan .No. Aaita7122B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Assessee By Smt.Neeru Agnihotri.Ar Revenue By Shri.Captain Pradeep Arya.Cit Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 05.03.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 06.03.2025 Order Per Bench: The Assessee Has Filed These Two Appeals Against The Separate Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions)(Cit(E)), Bangalore Passed (I) U/Sec12A Of The Act Dated21-09-2024 & (Ii) U/Sec80G Of The Act Dated 21-09-2024. 2.The Assessee Has Raised The Grounds Of Appeal Challenging The Orders Of The Cit(E) Rejecting The Amazing Grace Charitable Trust.. Application Filed For (I) Registration U/Sec12Ab Of The Act. & (Ii) Approval U/Sec80(5) Of The Act.

Income Tax (Exemptions)(CIT(E)), Bangalore passed (i) U/sec12A of the Act dated21-09-2024 and (ii) u/sec80G of the Act dated 21-09-2024. 2.The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the orders of the CIT(E) rejecting the Amazing Grace Charitable trust.. application filed for (i) registration u/sec12AB of the Act. And (ii) approval u/sec80

SHREE GEETA DHARM MANDAL,C/O S J KAMAT AND CO, SAKET vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos. 288/Pan/2024 (A.Y. 2024-25) Shree Geeta Dharam Vs Cit (Exemptions), Unity Building Annex, Mandal, . Mission Road, Opp:Gram Panchayat, Bangalore-560027, Anjuna Bardez, Karnataka. Anjuna-403509 . Goa. Pan .No. Aawts4171Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Assessee By None(Letter 5-03-2025) Revenue By Shri.Captain Pradeep Arya.Dr

Income Tax (Exemptions)(CIT(E)), Bangalore passed u/sec12AB(I)(b)(ii) of the Act. The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the order of the CIT(E) rejecting the application filed fror registration u/sec12AB of the Act. 2. The brief facts of the case are that, the assessee is a charitable trust and is undertaking charitable activities

PACT FOUNDATION,GOA vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos. 311/Pan/2024 (A.Y. 2024-25) Pact Foundation, Vs Cit (Exemptions), Unity Building Annex, F1,Pirazona Moria, Bardez . Mission Road, Aldona.S.O, Bangalore-560027, Jasmine Plaza, Karnataka. North Goa-403508 . Goa. Pan .No. Aaftp2682J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Assessee By None(Letter 4-03-2025) Revenue By Shri.Captain Pradeep Arya.Dr

Income Tax (Exemptions)(CIT(E)), Bangalore passed u/sec12AB(I)(b)(ii) of the Act. 2. There is a delay of 19 days in filing the appeal before the Hon’ble Tribunal and the assesse has filed the affidavit for condonation of delay. Whereas, the facts mentioned in the affidavit are reasonable and the Ld. DR has no specific objections. Accordingly

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2(1), MANGALORE vs. M/S THE SOUTH CANARA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD, MANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Income Tax (Appeals), Mangaluru [‘CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2014-15. 2. Ground Nos. 1, 6 and 7 raised by the Revenue are general in nature, hence, require no adjudication. 2 ITA No. 83/PAN/2018, A.Y. 2014-15 3. Ground Nos. 2 and 3 raised by the Revenue challenging the action of CIT(A) in deleting the addition made on account

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALORE

Appeals stands Allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 233 & 234/Pan/2025 Yakshit Yuva Foundation O/O Taekwondo Master Rao, 1St Fl, Gadekar Complex, P B Road, Kakati S.O., Belagavi. Pan : Aaaty9435D . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bangalore. . . . . . . . Respondent

addition to above the assessee Trust by separate application in Form No 10AB of even date had also applied for grant of 80G certificate u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Act. 4. The Ld. CIT(E) in-order to verify objects, activities and to ascertain the fulfilment of conditions for granting registration u/s 12AB and recognition

YAKSHIT YUVA FOUNDATION,BELAGAVI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

Appeals stands Allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 233 & 234/Pan/2025 Yakshit Yuva Foundation O/O Taekwondo Master Rao, 1St Fl, Gadekar Complex, P B Road, Kakati S.O., Belagavi. Pan : Aaaty9435D . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bangalore. . . . . . . . Respondent

addition to above the assessee Trust by separate application in Form No 10AB of even date had also applied for grant of 80G certificate u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Act. 4. The Ld. CIT(E) in-order to verify objects, activities and to ascertain the fulfilment of conditions for granting registration u/s 12AB and recognition

SHRI MAHARUDRA HANUMAN NYASA,PORVORIM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. No.346/Pan/2025 Shri.Maharudra Hanuman Vs Cit (Exemptions), Nyasa, Unity Buildingannexe, . M 60, Housing Board Colony, Mission Read, Alto Porvorim, Bengaluru-560027, Bardez, North Goa-403521, Karnataka. Goa. Pan .No. Aagts6084E (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) Assessee By Shri.Prashanth Jain.Ar Revenue By Shri.Satish.M.Cit-Dr

Income Tax (Exemptions)(CIT(E)), Bangalore passed u/sec12AB(I)(b)(ii) of the Act. The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the order of the CIT(E) rejecting the application filed for registration u/sec12AB of the Act. 2. The brief facts of the case are that, the assessee is a trust and is undertaking charitable activities. The assesse

FABRICA DA IGREJA DE PARRA,PARRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD - 1, PANAJI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 220 & 221/Pan/2025 Fabrica Da Igreja De Parra C/O, St. Annee Church Parra, Bardez, North Goa-403510 Pan : Aaatf2744C . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Panaji . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Ms Jinita Chatterjee [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Azar Zain [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 11/02/2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 13/02/2026 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; By Present Twin Appeals, The Assessee Impugns Separate Orders Of Rejection Passed U/S 12Ab(3) Of The Income Tax Act [In Short ‘The Act’] By The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bengaluru [In Short ‘Cit(E)’] Vide Din & Order No. Itba/Exm/F/Exm45/2025- 16/1077247685(1) Dt. 20/06/2025 & 1077646854(1) Dt. 24/06/2025. Itat-Panaji Page 1 Of 9

Income Tax, Exemption, Bengaluru [in short ‘CIT(E)’] vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2025- 16/1077247685(1) dt. 20/06/2025 and 1077646854(1) dt. 24/06/2025. ITAT-Panaji Page 1 of 9 Fabrica Da Igreja De Parra Vs ITO Ward-1, Panaji ITA Nos.220 & 221/PAN/2025 2. Since facts and issues involved in these twin appeals are identical, common & interrelated, on the request from rival

FABRICA DA IGREJA DE PARRA,PARRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION) WARD -1, PANAJI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 220 & 221/Pan/2025 Fabrica Da Igreja De Parra C/O, St. Annee Church Parra, Bardez, North Goa-403510 Pan : Aaatf2744C . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Panaji . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Ms Jinita Chatterjee [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Azar Zain [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 11/02/2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 13/02/2026 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; By Present Twin Appeals, The Assessee Impugns Separate Orders Of Rejection Passed U/S 12Ab(3) Of The Income Tax Act [In Short ‘The Act’] By The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Bengaluru [In Short ‘Cit(E)’] Vide Din & Order No. Itba/Exm/F/Exm45/2025- 16/1077247685(1) Dt. 20/06/2025 & 1077646854(1) Dt. 24/06/2025. Itat-Panaji Page 1 Of 9

Income Tax, Exemption, Bengaluru [in short ‘CIT(E)’] vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2025- 16/1077247685(1) dt. 20/06/2025 and 1077646854(1) dt. 24/06/2025. ITAT-Panaji Page 1 of 9 Fabrica Da Igreja De Parra Vs ITO Ward-1, Panaji ITA Nos.220 & 221/PAN/2025 2. Since facts and issues involved in these twin appeals are identical, common & interrelated, on the request from rival

OUR LADY OF THE ROSARY CHURCH,CARANZALEM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. No.392/Pan/2025 (A.Y. 2025-26) Our Lady Oftherosarychurch, Vs. Cit (Exemptions), Opposite Swimsea Hotel, Bangalore, Caranzalem,Tiswadi, Karnataka. Goa-403002. . Pan .No.Aaaao6765F (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent)

Income Tax (Exemptions)(CIT(E)), Bangalore passed u/sec12AB(I)(b)(ii) of the Act. The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the order of the CIT(E) rejecting the application filed fror registration u/sec12AB of the Act. 2. The brief facts of the case are that, the assessee is undertaking charitable activities. The assesse was granted provisional registration