BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 2(24)(x)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,020Mumbai1,018Bangalore356Jaipur252Ahmedabad236Kolkata212Karnataka191Chennai148Chandigarh148Hyderabad118Pune74Indore67Agra66Cochin58Raipur57Surat54Calcutta52Nagpur42Lucknow39Guwahati38Telangana26Rajkot21Visakhapatnam20Amritsar17SC16Cuttack15Jodhpur10Ranchi9Allahabad5Patna3Panaji3Varanasi3Rajasthan3Dehradun3Jabalpur2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Gauhati1Orissa1Punjab & Haryana1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 14A7Section 143(3)5Section 404Disallowance3Section 41(1)2Section 282Section 143(1)2Section 143(2)2Section 2632Addition to Income

SHRI NITIN A SHIRGURKAR,BELGAVI vs. PR. CIT, HUBBALI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowe

ITA 77/PAN/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 194A(3)(iv)Section 263Section 40

X 30%= Rs.30,086/- as per provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, which has not been provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, which has not been done. 3. On perusal of records, the following observations have also 3. On perusal of records, the following observations have also been made. been made. 5 I.T.A

INFRASTRUCTURE LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.,DONA PAULA vs. JOINT COMM. OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 1, PANAJI

2

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 380/PAN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 380/Pan/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Infrastructure Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Cidade De Goa, Vainguinim Beach, Dona Paula, Goa-403 004. Pan : Aaaci9107R .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Panaji-Goa, ……""यथ" / Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 381/Pan/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, Panaji-Goa, .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: Shri Nishant Thakkar, AR &For Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 28Section 40Section 41(1)

gains of business profession”, -- xxx---- (iv) the value of any benefit or perquisite, whether convertible into money or not, arising from business or the exercise of a profession; ----x xx---” 13) On a plain reading of Section 28 (iv) of the IT Act, prima facie, it appears that for the applicability of the said provision, the income which

ASSTT. COMM. OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI vs. INFRASTRUCTURE LOGISTICS PVT. LTD., DONA PAULA

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 381/PAN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 380/Pan/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Infrastructure Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Cidade De Goa, Vainguinim Beach, Dona Paula, Goa-403 004. Pan : Aaaci9107R .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Panaji-Goa, ……""यथ" / Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 381/Pan/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, Panaji-Goa, .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: Shri Nishant Thakkar, AR &For Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 28Section 40Section 41(1)

gains of business profession”, -- xxx---- (iv) the value of any benefit or perquisite, whether convertible into money or not, arising from business or the exercise of a profession; ----x xx---” 13) On a plain reading of Section 28 (iv) of the IT Act, prima facie, it appears that for the applicability of the said provision, the income which