BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Set Off of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,085Delhi1,075Kolkata495Jaipur353Ahmedabad276Chennai274Surat162Bangalore161Pune136Chandigarh130Indore117Hyderabad114Nagpur73Rajkot67Cochin58Raipur58Calcutta50Guwahati47Lucknow46Visakhapatnam44Amritsar32Cuttack25Jodhpur24Patna15Allahabad14Karnataka10Telangana10Agra8Varanasi6Ranchi5SC4Dehradun4Panaji3Orissa2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 14A5Section 143(1)3Section 143(2)3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 41(1)2Capital Gains2Short Term Capital Gains2Business Income

SOCIEADADE DE FOMENTO INDL. PVT. LTD.,MARGAO vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MARGAO RANGE, MARGAO

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and that of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 105/PAN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji12 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Sh. Nishant Thakkar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Ranjan Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14A

set aside on this issue and necessary directions be given to treat the sum of Rs.191,11,60,784/- as short term capital gain instead of business income. 6. The Ld. D.R. on the other hand strongly relied upon the orders of the lower authorities and opposed the submissions of the Learned Counsel for the Assessee. The Ld. D.R. contended

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI vs. M/S SOCIADADE DE FOMENTO INDUSTRIAL P. LTD, MARGAO

2

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and that of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 116/PAN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji12 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Sh. Nishant Thakkar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Ranjan Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14A

set aside on this issue and necessary directions be given to treat the sum of Rs.191,11,60,784/- as short term capital gain instead of business income. 6. The Ld. D.R. on the other hand strongly relied upon the orders of the lower authorities and opposed the submissions of the Learned Counsel for the Assessee. The Ld. D.R. contended

PRIME MINERAL EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED (NOW AMALGAMATED WITH FOMENTO RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED),PANAJI vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 1, PANAJI

The appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 3/PAN/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji05 Jun 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 003/Pan/2023 Assessment Year : 2009-10 Prime Mineral Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Now Amalgamated With Fomento Resources Pvt. Ltd.) 102, 1St Fl. Kamat Metropolis-1, Behind Caculo Mall, St. Inez, Panaji, Goa-403001. . . . . . . .Appellant Pan : Aadcp1647E V/S Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, . . . . . . . Respondent Range-1, Panaji, Goa

For Appellant: Mr Nishant Thakkar [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M. Satish [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 246ASection 250Section 253(1)Section 41(1)Section 4I

bogus or sham. The appellant’s failure to lay confirmation from MCTPL combined with insufficient documentary evidence to showcase the dispute over quality or quantity of purchases been primary reason behind disbelieving outstanding liability payable to MCTPL. The appellant’s former failure continued even in the second appellate proceedings. The only plea of the appellant that, since the equivalent amount