3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 43(5)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
5. In first appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) deleted the former addition upon satisfying that, while computing the aforestated excess stock of inventory, the Ld. AO did fail to consider shortage in stock of ‘runner & risers’ by 63.65 metric tonne which was valued at ₹11,45,700. The net valuation of inventory/stock at the former survey premises thus was arrived