Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “TDS”+ Section 246A(1)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi176 Indore119 Chennai109 Mumbai108 Pune70 Bangalore31 Jabalpur23 Dehradun22 Kolkata16 Chandigarh12 Nagpur11 Surat11 Panaji8 Jaipur8 Visakhapatnam5 Amritsar5 Hyderabad5 Karnataka4 Lucknow4 Jodhpur4 Raipur3 Cochin2 Ahmedabad2 Cuttack1 Agra1 Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 133A11 Section 201(1)9 Section 194A9 Section 2508 TDS8 Addition to Income8 Survey u/s 133A8 Section 2016 Section 253(2)5 Section 143(3)

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI vs. M/S POTDAR BROTHERS, BELAGAVI

Appeals of the Revenue are PARTLY ALLOWED for statistical purposes in aforestated terms

ITA 179/PAN/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji18 Nov 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M Satish [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 132Section 133ASection 138Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 246ASection 250Section 253(2)

5

Section 143(1)5

246A of the Act before first appellate authority which was allowed vide para 4.9 to 4.12 which reads as under; ITAT-Panaji Page 3 of 16 M/s Potdar Brothers ITA Nos.175 to 177 & 179 to 180/PAN/2025 4.9 The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mehta Parikh & Co. Vs CIT 30 ITR 181 held as under; “ITA No.1375

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI vs. M/S POTDAR BROTHERS, BELAGAVI

Appeals of the Revenue are PARTLY ALLOWED for statistical purposes in aforestated terms

ITA 177/PAN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji18 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M Satish [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 132Section 133ASection 138Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 246ASection 250Section 253(2)

246A of the Act before first appellate authority which was allowed vide para 4.9 to 4.12 which reads as under; ITAT-Panaji Page 3 of 16 M/s Potdar Brothers ITA Nos.175 to 177 & 179 to 180/PAN/2025 4.9 The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mehta Parikh & Co. Vs CIT 30 ITR 181 held as under; “ITA No.1375

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI vs. M/S POTDAR BROTHERS, BELAGAVI

Appeals of the Revenue are PARTLY ALLOWED for statistical purposes in aforestated terms

ITA 175/PAN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji18 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M Satish [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 132Section 133ASection 138Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 246ASection 250Section 253(2)

246A of the Act before first appellate authority which was allowed vide para 4.9 to 4.12 which reads as under; ITAT-Panaji Page 3 of 16 M/s Potdar Brothers ITA Nos.175 to 177 & 179 to 180/PAN/2025 4.9 The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mehta Parikh & Co. Vs CIT 30 ITR 181 held as under; “ITA No.1375

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI vs. M/S POTDAR BROTHERS, BELAGAVI

Appeals of the Revenue are PARTLY ALLOWED for statistical purposes in aforestated terms

ITA 180/PAN/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji18 Nov 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M Satish [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 132Section 133ASection 138Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 246ASection 250Section 253(2)

246A of the Act before first appellate authority which was allowed vide para 4.9 to 4.12 which reads as under; ITAT-Panaji Page 3 of 16 M/s Potdar Brothers ITA Nos.175 to 177 & 179 to 180/PAN/2025 4.9 The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mehta Parikh & Co. Vs CIT 30 ITR 181 held as under; “ITA No.1375

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELAGAVI vs. M/S POTDAR BROTHERS, BELAGAVI

Appeals of the Revenue are PARTLY ALLOWED for statistical purposes in aforestated terms

ITA 176/PAN/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji18 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M Satish [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 132Section 133ASection 138Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 246ASection 250Section 253(2)

246A of the Act before first appellate authority which was allowed vide para 4.9 to 4.12 which reads as under; ITAT-Panaji Page 3 of 16 M/s Potdar Brothers ITA Nos.175 to 177 & 179 to 180/PAN/2025 4.9 The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mehta Parikh & Co. Vs CIT 30 ITR 181 held as under; “ITA No.1375

UNION BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, TDS CIRCLE, PANAJI, PANAJI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 170/PAN/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji14 Jan 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr C Naresh [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Ms Rijjula Uniyal [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 131Section 133ASection 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250Section 253(1)

246A(1)(ha) of the Act, but remained unsuccessful. 4.6 Aggrieved by the separate orders of Ld. NFAC passed u/s 250 of the Act, the merged/amalgamated assessee bank [‘appellant’] came in present bunch of appeals with a delay of 803 days (as endorsed by registry) from the expiry of time limit within which these appeals u/s 253(1) were required

UNION BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, TDS CIRCLE, PANAJI, PANAJI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 169/PAN/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji14 Jan 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr C Naresh [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Ms Rijjula Uniyal [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 131Section 133ASection 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250Section 253(1)

246A(1)(ha) of the Act, but remained unsuccessful. 4.6 Aggrieved by the separate orders of Ld. NFAC passed u/s 250 of the Act, the merged/amalgamated assessee bank [‘appellant’] came in present bunch of appeals with a delay of 803 days (as endorsed by registry) from the expiry of time limit within which these appeals u/s 253(1) were required

UNION BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, TDS CIRCLE, PANAJI, PANAJI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 171/PAN/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji14 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr C Naresh [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Ms Rijjula Uniyal [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 131Section 133ASection 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250Section 253(1)

246A(1)(ha) of the Act, but remained unsuccessful. 4.6 Aggrieved by the separate orders of Ld. NFAC passed u/s 250 of the Act, the merged/amalgamated assessee bank [‘appellant’] came in present bunch of appeals with a delay of 803 days (as endorsed by registry) from the expiry of time limit within which these appeals u/s 253(1) were required