Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 194A(3)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai189 Bangalore94 Chandigarh87 Delhi85 Chennai36 Karnataka28 Kolkata26 Jaipur22 Ahmedabad16 Hyderabad16 Nagpur16 Pune15 Raipur13 Visakhapatnam11 Cuttack10 SC6 Jabalpur5 Rajkot5 Panaji5 Telangana4 Indore3 Ranchi3 Allahabad3 J&K2 Amritsar2 Cochin2 Dehradun2 Lucknow1 Surat1 Guwahati1 Patna1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)9 TDS5 Section 194A4 Deduction4 Section 1473 Section 2013 Section 197A3 Limitation/Time-bar3 Section 2632 Section 40

SHRI NITIN A SHIRGURKAR,BELGAVI vs. PR. CIT, HUBBALI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowe

ITA 77/PAN/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 194A(3)(iv)Section 263Section 40

section 194A(3)(iv) no disallowance is warranted. warranted. 10. The Pr.CIT erred in setting aside the issue of TDS

CANARA BANK, PANAJI BRANCH,PANAJI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE, PANAJI

Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn and Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

2

Section 194A(3)(iv)2

ITA 53/PAN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri S. Ananthan And MS. Lalitha RameswaranFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)

3. The Revenue’s cross-appeal ITA.No.77/PAN./2019 on the other hand plead the following grounds : i. “The Id. CIT(A) has erred in not considering the fact that the mere submission of a declaration is not 4 ITA.Nos.53, 54 & 79/PAN./2019 Canara Bank, Panaji Branch, Panaji Goa. sufficient. This declaration is to be in a prescribed manner

CANARA BANK,MARGAO vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE, PANAJI

Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn and Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 54/PAN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri S. Ananthan And MS. Lalitha RameswaranFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)

3. The Revenue’s cross-appeal ITA.No.77/PAN./2019 on the other hand plead the following grounds : i. “The Id. CIT(A) has erred in not considering the fact that the mere submission of a declaration is not 4 ITA.Nos.53, 54 & 79/PAN./2019 Canara Bank, Panaji Branch, Panaji Goa. sufficient. This declaration is to be in a prescribed manner

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE, PANAJI vs. CANARA BANK, MARGAO

Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn and Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 77/PAN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri S. Ananthan And MS. Lalitha RameswaranFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth

Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)

3. The Revenue’s cross-appeal ITA.No.77/PAN./2019 on the other hand plead the following grounds : i. “The Id. CIT(A) has erred in not considering the fact that the mere submission of a declaration is not 4 ITA.Nos.53, 54 & 79/PAN./2019 Canara Bank, Panaji Branch, Panaji Goa. sufficient. This declaration is to be in a prescribed manner

CHOWGULE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD,VASCO vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1), PANAJI

The appeal is partly allowed for statistical purpose as above

ITA 123/PAN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji20 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 123/Pan/2024 Assessment Year : 2013-14 Chowgule Industries Pvt. Ltd. 503, Gabmar Apartment, Vasco Da Gama, Goa. Pan:Aaccc9272H. . . . . . . . Appellant

For Appellant: Ms Pooja Bandekar [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Renga Rajan [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 194CSection 194HSection 246ASection 250Section 253(1)

TDS u/s 194A of the Act was deducted (iv) cash deposit of ₹12,16,69,672/- in one or more saving bank account and (v) cash deposit of ₹11,45,54,672/- ITAT-Panaji Page 2 of 5 Chowgule Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT, Panaji Goa ITA Nos.123/PAN/2024 AY: 2013-14 with a banking company. As there was no return