BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 90clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,066Delhi1,877Bangalore702Chennai394Hyderabad330Karnataka318Kolkata313Ahmedabad306Jaipur207Pune181Cochin124Indore115Chandigarh110Surat62Calcutta53Visakhapatnam51Lucknow38Cuttack35SC32Raipur31Nagpur28Telangana26Amritsar20Rajkot19Agra16Varanasi10Ranchi8Panaji8Rajasthan8Guwahati5Dehradun5Jodhpur5Jabalpur5Allahabad3Orissa2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2DIPAK MISRA V. GOPALA GOWDA1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Andhra Pradesh1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Patna1

BARUNEI ROLLER FLOUR MILL (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 1

In the result, the award of the maximum uniform rate for the

ITA/1/2022HC Orissa03 Nov 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI (ACJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882), to be registered may be received as evidence of a contract in a suit for specific performance under Chapter II of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 (3 of 1877), or as evidence of any collateral transaction not required to be effected by registered instrument.” Further, it is also important to note that

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs. INDUSTRIAL PROMOTION AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD.

Accordingly, the learned appellate authority has rightly dismissed the

ITA/15/2021HC Orissa31 Jan 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 107

90% of the total refund claimed was allowed to the tune of 6,70,26,012/- and show cause notice ₹ was issued to the petitioner on 7-6-2019 vide Annexure P-5 as to why the refund claimed to the extent of 51,48,531/- should not ₹ be rejected to which the petitioner filed its reply