BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 47clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,211Mumbai2,088Bangalore911Chennai473Ahmedabad406Kolkata388Karnataka349Hyderabad316Jaipur281Pune216Chandigarh195Indore167Cochin150Surat109Calcutta57Visakhapatnam56Rajkot50Lucknow44SC40Telangana39Raipur38Agra30Cuttack27Nagpur26Guwahati22Jodhpur16Amritsar10Rajasthan8Ranchi8Panaji6Kerala5Dehradun5Orissa4Jabalpur4Patna2Allahabad2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1DIPAK MISRA V. GOPALA GOWDA1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

BARUNEI ROLLER FLOUR MILL (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 1

In the result, the award of the maximum uniform rate for the

ITA/1/2022HC Orissa03 Nov 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI (ACJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

price of the land and building, standing crops, trees, cultivation etc., whereafter, the Collector vide letter dated 31.10.2003, had sent the application to the Special Judicial Officer for disposal. The Collector he submitted, has stated in the Reference that the amount of compensation was determined Page 43 of 99 on the basis of fair market value, but however

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs. INDUSTRIAL PROMOTION AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD.

Accordingly, the learned appellate authority has rightly dismissed the

ITA/15/2021HC Orissa31 Jan 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 107

price. 27. In that view of the matter, as it is admitted case of the petitioner that the electricity generated in 540 MW Power Plant is used in the course of or furtherance of his business, which is evident from Form G provided by the taxpayer i.e. the petitioner herein, the petitioner would not be entitled for ITC to electrical

M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

ITA/83/2010HC Orissa08 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 372A

transfer thereof is short-term capital gains. Hence any period of less than 12 months, be it a few days or few months is of holding the shares does not make any difference, in any case, the transaction would result in short-term capital gains. Further the ITA/83/2010 REPORTABLE Page 39 of 60 assessee contended that short-term capital gains

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.AHINSA VINIMAY PVT.LTD.

ITA/132/2018HC Orissa05 Apr 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 260

47-50 EPIP AREA, WHITEFIELD BANGALORE-560 066 PAN No.AAACN7425M. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MALLAHARAO K, ADV. FOR NAGESWAR RAO, ADV.,) Date of Judgment 30-08-2018, ITA No.132/2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5 & Another Vs. M/s Novo Nordisk India Pvt. Ltd., 2/11 THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING