M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

2) was issued on 20 October 2006. Thereafter notices under section 142 (1) was issued on several dates and the case was discussed with the authorised representative of the assessee. During the course of assessment proceedings several queries were raised by the assessing officer and in this appeal we are concerned about the issue as to whether the profit

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.AHINSA VINIMAY PVT.LTD.

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

47-50 EPIP AREA, WHITEFIELD BANGALORE-560 066 PAN No.AAACN7425M. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MALLAHARAO K, ADV. FOR NAGESWAR RAO, ADV.,) Date of Judgment 30-08-2018, ITA No.132/2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5 & Another Vs. M/s Novo Nordisk India Pvt. Ltd., 2/11 THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING