M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

IV, KOLKATA VERSUS M/S. CENTURY PLYBOARDS (I) LTD. Appearance:- Mr. Om Narayan Rai, Adv. .….For the Appellant. Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. S. Bhowmik, Adv. …..For the Respondent. ITA/83/2010 REPORTABLE Page 2 of 60 JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.) 1. This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 vs. INDIAN METALS AND FERRO ALLOYS LTD.

In the result, the substantial questions of law (i)

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Acting Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 3Rd April, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. ...For The Appellant Mr. Asim Choudhury, Adv. Mr. Soham Sen, Adv. ...For The Respondent. The Court : This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The ‘Act’ For Brevity) Is Directed Against The Order Dated October 17, 2018 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Kolkata (The Tribunal) In Ita No.524/Kol/2017 For The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration:

17, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal) in ITA No.524/Kol/2017 for the assessment year 2012-13. The revenue has raised the following substantial questions of law for consideration: 2 (i) Whether the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in law in determining the payment under the head of management support service

MAHESWAR PANDA vs. I.T.O., WARD-2(1)

Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI,MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY

IV (2014) ACC 871 (MP) National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Cholleti Bharatamma & others, Civil Appeal nos.4845-4847 of 2017 (SC) and; New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs. Vedwati and others, Civil appeal no.860 of 2007 (SC). 26. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 & 2 has relied upon the Fahim Ahmad and others versus United India Insurance Company Ltd. And other