BARUNEI ROLLER FLOUR MILL (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 1

In the result, the award of the maximum uniform rate for the

Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI (ACJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

56 Smti. Hiarmon Nongrum 39. Smti. Kril Syiemlieh :::Cross Objector/Respondent No.52/ (now deceased) Substituted by Claimant No. 57 her daughter Smti. Ebrian Syiemlieh 40. Smti. Ibon Lyngdoh (deceased) :::Cross Objector/Respondent No.53/ Substituted by her daughter Claimant No. 58 Smti. Mardis Lyngdoh 41. Smti. Mebeldalis Khyriemmujat :::Cross Objector/Respondent No.54/ (deceased) Substituted by her Claimant No. 59 daughter Smti. Teidalin Khyriemmujat Page

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S. ROLAND EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

1) at the declared income of Rs. 4,200. In view of these facts, I have reason to believe that the amount of such transactions particularly that of Rs. 5,00,000 (as mentioned above) has escaped the assessment within the meaning of the proviso to section 147 and clause (b) to Explanation 2 of this section. Submitted

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs. PARBATI MOHAPATRA

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

1) at the declared income of Rs. 4,200. In view of these facts, I have reason to believe that the amount of such transactions particularly that of Rs. 5,00,000 (as mentioned above) has escaped the assessment within the meaning of the proviso to section 147 and clause (b) to Explanation 2 of this section. Submitted

COMNR.,OF INCOME TAX vs. FALCON REAL ESTATE

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires

COMNR.OF INCOME TAX vs. ORISSA MINING CORP.

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 vs. HARSHAD RAI MEHTA

Bench: MR. JUSTICE HARISH TANDON (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

56 Years, F-502, Kool Homes, Daldal Seoni Road, Mowa, Raipur, Tehsil And District-Raipur- 492004 (C.G.) Office Address- Shree Shivam Shopping Mall, Station Road, Santrabadi, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 491001. ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Union Of India Through Secretary, Central Board Of Direct Taxes, Noth Block, New Delhi. 2. Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Raipur-1, Aaykar Bhawan