BARUNEI ROLLER FLOUR MILL (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 1

In the result, the award of the maximum uniform rate for the

Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI (ACJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

32. Smti. Julestinora Lyngdoh :::Cross Objector/Respondent No.46/ D/o (L) Thrinlisi Lyngdoh Claimant No. 50 Page 11 of 99 (Substituted vide Court’s order dated 03/10/2024 passed in MC (CRAPPL) No. 1 of 2024) 33. Smti. Iarly Susngi :::Cross Objector/Respondent No.47/ Claimant No. 51 34. Smti. Phian Kharthangmaw :::Cross Objector/Respondent No.48/ (deceased) Substituted by her Claimant No. 52 daughter Smti. Shrar

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S. ROLAND EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

1) at the declared income of Rs. 4,200. In view of these facts, I have reason to believe that the amount of such transactions particularly that of Rs. 5,00,000 (as mentioned above) has escaped the assessment within the meaning of the proviso to section 147 and clause (b) to Explanation 2 of this section. Submitted

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs. PARBATI MOHAPATRA

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

1) at the declared income of Rs. 4,200. In view of these facts, I have reason to believe that the amount of such transactions particularly that of Rs. 5,00,000 (as mentioned above) has escaped the assessment within the meaning of the proviso to section 147 and clause (b) to Explanation 2 of this section. Submitted

COMNR.,OF INCOME TAX vs. FALCON REAL ESTATE

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires

COMNR.OF INCOME TAX vs. ORISSA MINING CORP.

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires

PRINCIPAL COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, SAMBALPUR vs. BINAY KUMAR JINDAL, HUF

Accordingly, this appeal fails and is dismissed

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

32 proceeding to revise the annual valuation for the periods in question by deciding the issue of limitation erroneously, as contended by the petitioners. Therefore, the decision in the case of Raza Textiles (supra) is of no assistance to the petitioners. 36. We are in complete agreement with the observations and conclusion of the learned Single Judge. A judgment cannot

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 vs. HARSHAD RAI MEHTA

Bench: MR. JUSTICE HARISH TANDON (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

32 Years, Registered Office At 206, Bajrang Nagar, Near Agrasen Chowk, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 7 ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Union Of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, (Department Of Revenue), No. 137, North Block, New Delhi- 110001. 2. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur, Having His Office At New C.R. Building, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Assistant Commissioner Of Income