BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,482Mumbai1,475Bangalore439Ahmedabad375Chennai344Kolkata340Jaipur313Hyderabad211Pune183Raipur116Rajkot115Indore105Chandigarh103Cuttack65Surat60Cochin60Nagpur59Lucknow50Ranchi48Agra47Patna47Karnataka42Amritsar41Guwahati40Visakhapatnam30Dehradun30Allahabad26SC24Jodhpur21Telangana21Panaji10Calcutta6Jabalpur5Orissa4Varanasi4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Rajasthan1J&K1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Uttarakhand1Kerala1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 1482

NEELACHAL I.NIGAM L. vs. ASST.COMNR.OF I.TAX

ITA/8/2005HC Orissa17 Nov 2021

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

Section 143(1)(a)

reassess the assessee was not independent but was at the instance of superior officer. 42. Now next coming to the substantial questions of law which were admitted for hearing at the instance of Revenue on 13-2-2013, which have already been quoted in para 4 (G) of this judgment. 20 (1987) 4 SCC 611 37 ITA No.6

PRINCIPAL COMNR. OF INCOME TAX, SAMBALPUR RANGE vs. M/S. TATA SPONGE IRON LTD.

ITA/96/2022HC Orissa17 Aug 2023

Bench: MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

REASSESSMENT: A BRIEF OVERVIEW 19. Before we proceed to record the submissions that were advanced by and on behalf of respective sides, it would be appropriate to take note of and extract the relevant statutory provisions on the basis of which the question as posited would be liable to be answered. The subject of valuation of goods is firstly dealt

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, BBSR vs. M/S. POSCO INDIA PVT. LTD.

The appeal is allowed and the

ITA/89/2022HC Orissa15 Feb 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 148

penalty notices. The notice/order impugned in the writ petition was challenged mainly on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice, arbitrary, erroneous, illegal, invalid and perverse and, consequently, without jurisdiction. Various facts were set out in the writ petition to substantiate those grounds. The learned Single Judge by the impugned order had dismissed the writ petition

PRINCIPAL COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, SAMBALPUR vs. BINAY KUMAR JINDAL, HUF

Accordingly, this appeal fails and is dismissed

ITA/7/2023HC Orissa02 Mar 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 174Section 189

penalty provided for in Chapter XVI of the KMC Act. Section 573 of the Act is to the following effect:- “573. Recovery of certain dues of Corporation. - Save as otherwise provided in this Act or the rules or the regulations made thereunder, any sum due to the Corporation on account of any charge, cost, expense, fee, rate or rent