BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment”+ Block Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,547Mumbai1,187Chennai434Bangalore415Hyderabad217Kolkata214Jaipur195Ahmedabad167Chandigarh95Karnataka84Raipur69Amritsar58Nagpur52Indore41Guwahati40Agra39Telangana36Cochin36Rajkot34Lucknow32Patna32Allahabad26Cuttack26Calcutta22Surat21Pune20Ranchi14Jodhpur14Dehradun11Jabalpur9SC9Visakhapatnam8Orissa5Rajasthan4Gauhati3Kerala2Panaji1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 2602

NEELACHAL I.NIGAM L. vs. ASST.COMNR.OF I.TAX

ITA/8/2005HC Orissa17 Nov 2021

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

Section 143(1)(a)

reassessment on the dictates of the higher authorities sitting at Delhi and Jabalpur. 71. Once having held that the reassessment started at the dictation of the higher authorities and thereafter, during reassessment process too continuous instructions were imparted and even the AO obtained instructions, therefore, the end result would be same as the bias would exist. Decision of reassessment, reassessment

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BHUBANESWAR vs. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD.

ITA/38/2017HC Orissa14 Nov 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 143(3)Section 153A
Section 153D
Section 260

block assessment. He relies upon the Order passed by the Tribunal, Pune Bench ‘B’, in the case of ‘Akil Gulamali Somji v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4[5], Pune’, decided on 30.03.2012. However, learned Counsel was not having the original Manual of Office Procedure for our perusal. 6. Section 153D of the Act relevant for our purposes is quoted below

COMNR.,OF INCOME TAX vs. FALCON REAL ESTATE

ITA/5/2012HC Orissa10 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

reassessment of market value using a fair and just approach. Learned Counsel clarifies that they are seeking compensation based on actual usage and future potentiality of the acquired land. It is submitted that if the land is capable of being used for building purposes in the near future, its valuation must reflect such capability. Reliance is placed on Clause

COMNR.OF INCOME TAX vs. ORISSA MINING CORP.

ITA/40/2007HC Orissa07 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

reassessment of market value using a fair and just approach. Learned Counsel clarifies that they are seeking compensation based on actual usage and future potentiality of the acquired land. It is submitted that if the land is capable of being used for building purposes in the near future, its valuation must reflect such capability. Reliance is placed on Clause

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 vs. HARSHAD RAI MEHTA

ITA/57/2023HC Orissa08 Jan 2026

Bench: MR. JUSTICE HARISH TANDON (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Block, New Delhi- 110001 --- Respondent(s) For Respective Petitioners : Mr. S. Rajeshwar Rao, Mr. Vijay Shankar Mishra, Mr. Hari Agrawal, with Ms. Khushi Agrawal, Mr. Siddharth Shukla, Mr. Moolchand Jain, Mr. Apurv Goyal, Mr. Nikhilesh Begani, Mr. Neelabh Dubey with Mr. Jitendra Sahu, Advocates For Respective Respondents : Mr. Amit Chaudhri,Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Mr. Topilal Bareth, Ms. Annapurna Tiwari, Advocates