BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 57clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,703Delhi3,854Bangalore1,584Chennai1,266Kolkata1,010Ahmedabad643Hyderabad430Jaipur406Pune398Indore293Chandigarh271Surat245Cochin183Rajkot160Raipur137Nagpur123Lucknow109Visakhapatnam108Karnataka89Cuttack65Panaji63Allahabad48Amritsar48Calcutta46Telangana42Jodhpur40Ranchi40Agra39SC35Varanasi25Dehradun24Patna23Guwahati22Jabalpur16Kerala6Punjab & Haryana6Orissa2RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1Himachal Pradesh1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Rajasthan1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 35A5

M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

ITA/83/2010HC Orissa08 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 372A

Section 14A of the Act. It was pointed out that the said conclusion is reached because nexus has not been established between expenditure disallowed and earning of exempt income. The revenue failed to substantiate their argument that the assessee was required to maintain separate accounts and that the revenue has failed ITA/83/2010 REPORTABLE Page 50 of 60 to refer

M/S.G.K.W.LTD vs. COMNR.OF INCOMETAX

The appeal is disposed of in the

ITA/50/2006HC Orissa16 Aug 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Section 35ASection 56Section 57

57 (iii) of the Act in respect of the interest expenditure and public issue expenses incurred in respect of the funds which gave rise to interest income assessable under Section 56? (b) Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in upholding the taxation of interest received amounting to Rs.1,02,02,714/- for the assessment year 1991-92? Page