BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 50clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai7,733Delhi6,415Chennai2,030Bangalore1,970Kolkata1,799Ahmedabad1,004Hyderabad692Jaipur656Pune600Indore441Surat383Chandigarh375Raipur314Rajkot257Nagpur207Cochin201Visakhapatnam167Lucknow156Amritsar154Karnataka150Cuttack81Allahabad76Jodhpur66Telangana65Guwahati65Patna59Calcutta59SC55Ranchi52Agra47Panaji45Dehradun34Varanasi24Kerala19Jabalpur10Punjab & Haryana7Himachal Pradesh3Orissa3Rajasthan3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Uttarakhand1Gauhati1Bombay1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

Key Topics

Section 2542Disallowance2Addition to Income2

M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

ITA/83/2010HC Orissa08 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 372A

Section 14A of the Act. It was pointed out that the said conclusion is reached because nexus has not been established between expenditure disallowed and earning of exempt income. The revenue failed to substantiate their argument that the assessee was required to maintain separate accounts and that the revenue has failed ITA/83/2010 REPORTABLE Page 50

PURI HOTEL P.LTD vs. ADDL.COMNR.OF TAX

The appeal is disposed of in the above terms

ITA/151/2004HC Orissa04 Jan 2022

Bench: The Tribunal?

Section 254

section 254 of the I.T. Act, 1961 that as a consequence of the impugned order of the Tribunal, a sum of Rs.80,221/- is payable by the petitioner to the Income Tax Department. We direct that on the petitioner paying 50% of the said amount of Rs.80,221/-by the end of January, 2005 the balance of the demand shall

NALCO vs. COMNR.OF INCOME TAX

ITA/133/2012HC Orissa09 May 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani & The Hon’Ble Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj Date : 16Th January, 2024 Appearance : Sri Vipul Kundalia, Adv. Smt. Oindrilla Ghosal, Adv. ...For The Appellant. Sri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Sri Sanjoy Bhaumik, Adv. Smt. Swapna Das, Adv. ...For The Respondent. 1. Heard Sri Vipul Kundalia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel For The Appellant/Revenue & Sri J.P. Khaitan, Learned Senior Advocate Assisted By Sri Sanjoy Bhaumik & Smt. Swapna Das, Learned Advocates For The Respondent/Assessee. 2. This Appeal Was Admitted By This Court By An Order Dated 30.11.2012 On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law: “1) Whether In View Of The Facts & Circumstances Of The Instant Case The Tribunal Erred By Not Considering That Subsides Which May Be Used Freely

Section 43(6)Section 89

disallowance made by Assessing Officer on account of claim of deduction of proportionate amount of lease hold land written off of Rs.20,50,052? 3) Whether the Hon’ble ITAT has erred in law as well as on facts by deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of profit on sale of machinery of a closed down