BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 41(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,262Delhi4,061Bangalore1,635Chennai1,263Kolkata980Ahmedabad630Hyderabad537Jaipur453Pune275Chandigarh266Indore224Surat218Raipur205Nagpur157Amritsar156Lucknow144Cochin106Agra92Karnataka89Rajkot89Visakhapatnam88Cuttack82Allahabad66Guwahati54Calcutta46Panaji43SC40Telangana33Ranchi26Jodhpur23Varanasi22Patna19Kerala15Dehradun13Punjab & Haryana4Rajasthan4Jabalpur3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Orissa2Himachal Pradesh1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Tripura1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

ITA/83/2010HC Orissa08 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 372A

b) the investment should be less than the amount of profit earned or which could reasonably be deemed to have been earned, regard being to the date of expenditure. It is submitted that in the instant case, it has not been averred nor shown that the profits have been deposited in the cash credit account were from borrowing/withdrawals had been

NALCO vs. COMNR.OF INCOME TAX

ITA/133/2012HC Orissa09 May 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani & The Hon’Ble Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj Date : 16Th January, 2024 Appearance : Sri Vipul Kundalia, Adv. Smt. Oindrilla Ghosal, Adv. ...For The Appellant. Sri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Sri Sanjoy Bhaumik, Adv. Smt. Swapna Das, Adv. ...For The Respondent. 1. Heard Sri Vipul Kundalia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel For The Appellant/Revenue & Sri J.P. Khaitan, Learned Senior Advocate Assisted By Sri Sanjoy Bhaumik & Smt. Swapna Das, Learned Advocates For The Respondent/Assessee. 2. This Appeal Was Admitted By This Court By An Order Dated 30.11.2012 On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law: “1) Whether In View Of The Facts & Circumstances Of The Instant Case The Tribunal Erred By Not Considering That Subsides Which May Be Used Freely

Section 43(6)Section 89

1) Whether in view of the facts and circumstances of the instant case the Tribunal erred by not considering that subsides which may be used freely, are operational subsidies and not capital subsides and thus the same are taxable as revenue income? 2) Whether the Hon’ble ITAT has erred in law as well as on facts by deleting