BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 37(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai7,640Delhi6,768Bangalore2,262Chennai2,179Kolkata1,705Ahmedabad965Hyderabad720Jaipur631Pune478Indore402Chandigarh318Surat310Karnataka216Raipur213Rajkot207Cochin181Visakhapatnam158Nagpur158Amritsar154Lucknow119Cuttack101Guwahati80Allahabad67SC66Calcutta66Telangana65Ranchi63Jodhpur55Patna53Panaji51Agra35Dehradun29Kerala25Jabalpur16Punjab & Haryana12Varanasi8Himachal Pradesh3Rajasthan3Gauhati2Orissa2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Tripura1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Section 2542

M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

ITA/83/2010HC Orissa08 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 372A

1) was issued on several dates and the case was discussed with the authorised representative of the assessee. During the course of assessment proceedings several queries were raised by the assessing officer and in this appeal we are concerned about the issue as to whether the profit of Rs 4,32,09,144/- on sale of shares in six companies

PURI HOTEL P.LTD vs. ADDL.COMNR.OF TAX

The appeal is disposed of in the above terms

ITA/151/2004HC Orissa04 Jan 2022

Bench: The Tribunal?

Section 254

1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 3rd April, 2004 passed by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, (ITAT) in ITA No. Nos. 53 of 2001 for the assessment years (AY) 1995-96. 2. While admitting the present appeal on 12th October, 2004, the following question of law was framed for consideration: “Whether