BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 33clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,331Delhi5,663Bangalore2,063Chennai1,827Kolkata1,366Ahmedabad860Hyderabad702Jaipur576Pune413Indore394Surat389Chandigarh370Raipur282Nagpur178Amritsar166Rajkot159Karnataka158Cochin149Visakhapatnam147Lucknow121Agra98Cuttack89Allahabad58SC55Jodhpur53Guwahati50Ranchi48Calcutta48Panaji47Patna47Telangana36Dehradun25Kerala21Varanasi16Jabalpur14Punjab & Haryana6Orissa4Rajasthan3Himachal Pradesh2ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Tripura1

Key Topics

Section 14810Section 14A3Section 143(1)3Section 143(3)3Section 2602Section 45(2)2Capital Gains2Reassessment2Reopening of Assessment2

M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

ITA/83/2010HC Orissa08 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 372A

Section 14A of the Act. It was pointed out that the said conclusion is reached because nexus has not been established between expenditure disallowed and earning of exempt income. The revenue failed to substantiate their argument that the assessee was required to maintain separate accounts and that the revenue has failed ITA/83/2010 REPORTABLE Page 50 of 60 to refer

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BHUBANESWAR vs. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD.

In the result, the appeal stands disposed of in terms of

ITA/33/2017HC Orissa14 Nov 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 115Section 115JSection 14Section 14ASection 260Section 45(2)

33 OF 2017 BETWEEN: 1. The Commissioner of Income-tax, LTU, JSS Towers, BSK III Stage, Bengaluru-560 085. 2. The Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, LTU, JSS Towers, BSK III Stage, Bengaluru-560 085. … Appellants (By Sri. Aravind K.V, Advocate) AND: M/s. Canara Bank, BSCA Section, FM & S Wing, HO, No.112, JC Road, Bengaluru-560 002. ... Respondent

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S. ROLAND EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST

ITA/25/2022HC Orissa09 Feb 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148

disallowances u/ s 14A read with rule 8D also applicable in the case. The statement given by Shri Himanshu Verma also establishes the link with the self-confessed “accommodation entry providers” whose business is to help assessees bring back their unaccounted money into This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs. PARBATI MOHAPATRA

ITA/19/2022HC Orissa08 Feb 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148

disallowances u/ s 14A read with rule 8D also applicable in the case. The statement given by Shri Himanshu Verma also establishes the link with the self-confessed “accommodation entry providers” whose business is to help assessees bring back their unaccounted money into This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi