BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 30clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9,033Delhi7,351Bangalore2,558Chennai2,410Kolkata2,186Ahmedabad1,685Hyderabad1,058Jaipur980Pune824Indore531Chandigarh463Surat449Raipur349Rajkot338Cochin281Karnataka249Amritsar240Nagpur237Cuttack221Lucknow220Visakhapatnam205Agra154Jodhpur100Allahabad86Panaji85Guwahati81SC77Ranchi75Telangana74Dehradun70Patna64Calcutta59Jabalpur37Varanasi26Kerala24Punjab & Haryana12Orissa4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Rajasthan4Himachal Pradesh3Gauhati1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1Uttarakhand1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Tripura1

Key Topics

Section 14810Section 143(1)3Section 143(3)3Section 260A2Reassessment2Reopening of Assessment2

M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

ITA/83/2010HC Orissa08 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 372A

Section 143 (3) of the Act wherein the assessee’s total income was Rs. 7,08,30,550/-. Similarly, by referring to the assessment order dated 14.02.2014 for the assessment year 2004-2005, it was shown that the total income of the assessee was Rs. 4,38,22,890/-. As already pointed out the tribunal also noted that

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXEXEMPTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. SIKSHYA O ANUSANDHAN

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/37/2018HC Orissa03 Jan 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam A N D The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : February 15, 2022. [Via Video Conference] Appearance : Mr. Debasish Chowdhury, Adv. … For The Appellant Mr. R.K. Murarka, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sutapa Roy Choudhury, Adv. Ms. Aratrika Roy, Adv. … For The Respondent The Court : This Appeal By The Revenue Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 3Rd May, 2017 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) In

Section 14ASection 260ASection 73

Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the disallowance made of total Rs.59,30,273/- was not correct

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S. ROLAND EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST

ITA/25/2022HC Orissa09 Feb 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148

30 January 2024 on the following questions of law:- “(a) Whether examination and analysis of information received from Investigation Wing and co-relating it with the record available with the Assessing Officer [„AO’] is not sufficient application of mind by the AO to issue notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ["Act"]? (b) Whether the remark

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs. PARBATI MOHAPATRA

ITA/19/2022HC Orissa08 Feb 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148

30 January 2024 on the following questions of law:- “(a) Whether examination and analysis of information received from Investigation Wing and co-relating it with the record available with the Assessing Officer [„AO’] is not sufficient application of mind by the AO to issue notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ["Act"]? (b) Whether the remark